Overview - MPC
Overview - MPC
Overview - MPC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2009<br />
• Based on the performance indicator,<br />
Malaysia’s efficiency of public<br />
administration was higher than the rest<br />
of selected Asian economies except<br />
Singapore and Hong Kong. Malaysia’s<br />
performance was better than selected<br />
OECD countries such as Japan, UK and<br />
France. Overall, Denmark was leading<br />
in the efficiency of public administration<br />
in 2009 followed by Singapore and<br />
Finland (Table 7.5).<br />
CHAPTER 7<br />
Table 7.4: Ranking of Public Administration Efficiency with Population of More than 20 Million<br />
Government Bribery Legal and Adaptability Transparency Bureaucracy<br />
decision regulatory of government<br />
framework<br />
policy<br />
Malaysia 18 31 10 10 31 16<br />
Australia 9 5 6 4 9 7<br />
Canada 19 9 7 13 13 10<br />
Japan 47 18 39 43 44 26<br />
Korea 39 29 54 44 37 39<br />
Taiwan 26 28 26 23 35 15<br />
Thailand 28 41 21 16 29 23<br />
UK 44 15 25 27 32 35<br />
USA 38 23 19 29 26 27<br />
Source: World Competitiveness Yearbook 2009<br />
Figure 7.19: Framework for Measuring Efficiency in Public Administration<br />
Efficiency in<br />
Public<br />
Administration<br />
Government<br />
Decision<br />
Government<br />
Policy<br />
Transparency<br />
Bribery &<br />
Corruption<br />
Legal & Regulatory<br />
Framework<br />
Bureaucracy<br />
The extent to which government<br />
decisions are actively implemented<br />
The extent to which government policy<br />
is adaptable to change in the economy<br />
The extent to which government policy<br />
is transparent<br />
The extent of non-existence of high<br />
bribery and corruption<br />
The extent of the ability of the<br />
government to create conducive<br />
environment for enterprises to do<br />
business and invest<br />
The extent of bureaucracy not hindering<br />
business activities<br />
PRODUCTIVITY REPORT 2009 101