30.09.2014 Views

PDF - Department of the Treasury

PDF - Department of the Treasury

PDF - Department of the Treasury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strategy to evaluate <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong><br />

underreporting by employers. IRS<br />

management agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />

recommendation and is taking steps to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> problem.<br />

Report Reference No. 2005-30-126<br />

The IRS has not used State tax amnesty<br />

information as an ongoing tool to help<br />

ensure compliance with Federal tax laws.<br />

As a result, it is missing a unique<br />

opportunity to address noncompliant<br />

taxpayers who have acknowledged <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

noncompliance with tax laws to State<br />

governments and who also may owe<br />

Federal taxes. Although an IRS study<br />

included considerable analysis <strong>of</strong> tax<br />

amnesty data for individual taxpayers from<br />

two states, it did not fully explore <strong>the</strong><br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> this information and its<br />

usefulness in IRS compliance programs.<br />

Tax amnesty programs are designed to<br />

collect taxes owed from prior years and<br />

place those who previously avoided<br />

taxation on <strong>the</strong> tax rolls. Over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

23 years, at least 41 states and two cities<br />

have collected more than $5.7 billion from<br />

tax amnesty programs. To encourage<br />

taxpayers to participate, <strong>the</strong>se programs<br />

generally forgave all civil and criminal<br />

penalties. However, <strong>the</strong>y differed as to<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r all or a portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interest<br />

was forgiven.<br />

TIGTA recommended that <strong>the</strong> IRS evaluate<br />

current Federal and State exchange<br />

programs to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r State tax<br />

amnesty information could be obtained and,<br />

if so, how this data could be used in IRS<br />

compliance programs. IRS management<br />

agreed with <strong>the</strong> recommendations and<br />

proposed corrective action.<br />

Report Reference No. 2005-30-165<br />

The IRS estimates it will achieve<br />

approximately $1.17 billion in additional<br />

revenues if additional funding for its<br />

proposed FY 2006 enforcement initiatives<br />

is approved. This would equate to a<br />

4.4 to 1 return on <strong>the</strong> additional investment<br />

when <strong>the</strong> employees become fully<br />

productive in FY 2008. IRS <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> 4.4 to 1 return on investment is<br />

a conservative estimate, but TIGTA’s<br />

analysis indicates <strong>the</strong> estimate may be too<br />

high. IRS revenue projections were based<br />

on historical averages that weighted data<br />

equally from years when IRS priorities and<br />

technology were substantially different than<br />

in recent years. In addition, business units<br />

did not always provide specific information<br />

to correlate revenue projections to <strong>the</strong> goals<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initiatives.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> IRS currently does not<br />

have a methodology to measure revenue<br />

resulting from any adopted initiatives, such<br />

as <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> increased investment in<br />

enforcement activities. The absence <strong>of</strong><br />

such a measurement limits <strong>the</strong> IRS’<br />

estimating ability to assist in budgeting and<br />

resource allocation.<br />

TIGTA recommended that <strong>the</strong> business<br />

units provide more information on <strong>the</strong> type<br />

<strong>of</strong> work expected to be completed by <strong>the</strong><br />

additional staff to allow <strong>the</strong> IRS to more<br />

accurately project revenues. Additionally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> IRS should consider using a forecasting<br />

model that assigns greater weight to more<br />

recent years’ data, such as exponential<br />

smoothing, when appropriate. The IRS<br />

should also develop a methodology to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> increased<br />

investments in enforcement activities.<br />

April 1, 2005 to September 30, 2005 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!