07.10.2014 Views

1^

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

'Problem Parents' Scored<br />

By Mrs. Twyman in Mich.<br />

GRAND RAPIDS, MICH —A strong<br />

position<br />

against government censorship and<br />

legal classification was taken by Mrs. Margaret<br />

Twyman, director of community relations,<br />

in an address to the Federation of<br />

Motion Picture Councils in the Pantlind<br />

Hotel here Wednesday (UK<br />

Mrs. Twyman said the motion picture<br />

Industry was faced with a new problem<br />

which might be termed "problem parents."<br />

She said such parents were those who<br />

would not make the necessary effort to determine<br />

from reliable sources which pictures<br />

were playing at the local theatre and<br />

to decide for themselves, based on available<br />

information, whether or not they wanted<br />

their children to see a given picture.<br />

"Certainly we want suitable films for the<br />

mature mind as well as film for the entire<br />

family," Mrs. Twyman said. "Parents must<br />

make the effort to select films for their<br />

children. There need be no embarrassment<br />

or disappointment on the part of any parent<br />

willing to accept his responsibility<br />

in this area."<br />

Another speaker on the program was<br />

Taylor Mills, public relations director of<br />

the MPAA, who discussed motion picture<br />

advertising and the Advertising Code. He<br />

stressed the fact that today's film advertising<br />

must be factual as well as developing<br />

the desire to see the pictm-e.<br />

Mills said that because many films today<br />

were designated for a mature audience, it<br />

was imperative that the advertising be directed<br />

especially to that audience. He said<br />

every reader of film advertising should be<br />

reasonably certain concerning the type of<br />

picture offered, thus allowing the reader to<br />

make up his mind as to whether he wanted<br />

to invest in this entertainment. The most<br />

effective advertising is that which arrests<br />

the attention and creates a desire to see<br />

a picture, he said.<br />

MPC Federation Award<br />

Goes to 'Parent Trap'<br />

GRAND RAPIDS, MICH.—Walt Disney's<br />

"The Parent Trap" was awarded the Federation<br />

of Motion Picture Councils citation as<br />

the best family picture of the year at the<br />

concluding banquet of the federation's twoday<br />

conference here Wednesday and<br />

Thursday ill, 12).<br />

Tlie award was accepted, in behalf of<br />

Disney, by Frank Jones, Buena 'Vista manager<br />

at Detroit. Disney won the same<br />

award last year for "Pollyanna."<br />

A special award went to Spyros Skouras,<br />

president of 20th Centuo'-Fox. It was accepted<br />

by Sol Gordon, publicity and advertising<br />

director of the 20th-Pox Chicago<br />

office.<br />

Over 300 representatives of motion picture<br />

councils in the nation attended the<br />

conference at the Hotel Pantlind. A highlight<br />

was a panel on "Previewer—Critic<br />

or Censor?" with preview chairmen of ten<br />

different councils participating. It was<br />

moderated by Mrs. S. Juhan Colyer, federation<br />

preview chairman and evaluator of<br />

the Green Sheet.<br />

Representing the industry at the conference<br />

were Milton H. London, executive<br />

director of National Allied; Alden Smith,<br />

Cooperative Theatres of Michigan, and<br />

Margaret Twyman, director of community<br />

relations for the MPAA.<br />

Georgia High Court Rules<br />

Against Censor Board<br />

ATLANTA — The end of the city of<br />

Atlanta's movie censorship laws was<br />

marked Saturday i7) when the Georgia<br />

supreme coui-t in a 6-1 majority declared<br />

them to be in violation of the state constitution.<br />

Georgia's highest court's hLstoric<br />

action as good as put the Altanta Board of<br />

Censors out of business who had heretofore<br />

required all movies to be shown in the<br />

metropolitan area to first have their<br />

approval.<br />

MANY PRECEDENTS CITED<br />

The court, in handing down its<br />

decision,<br />

said, "The chapter and ordinance which<br />

provide for city pei-mits as prerequisites to<br />

exhibiting any picture offend the constitution<br />

and are void."<br />

Only one of the seven justices cast a dissenting<br />

vote. Justice Thomas S. Candler.<br />

Justices Carleton Mobley and Joseph Quillian<br />

concurred "specially" meaning more<br />

can be expected from them on this subject<br />

a little later.<br />

Chief Justice W. H. Duckworth, who<br />

wrote the 6-1 majority opinion, cited a<br />

large number of legal precedents which<br />

supported the Georgia court's view that<br />

there is no merit in the attack on the censorship<br />

laws "upwn the ground that 'forbidding<br />

the showing of any picture without its<br />

having been approved by the censor offends<br />

the U.S. Constitution.' The court held<br />

that the city's censorsliip laws in its<br />

charter and ordinances violated the<br />

Georgia constitution, and not the U.S.<br />

Constitution." Justice Duckworth said,<br />

"The chai-ter and ordinance provision, requiring<br />

uispection of the protected pictures,<br />

and also requiring a permit from the<br />

city authorities before any picture can be<br />

exhibited in the theatre, violates the state<br />

constitution. The words of the constitution<br />

reading, 'no law shall ever be passed to cm--<br />

tail or restrain,' are irreconcilable with any<br />

law, including a city ordinance, that does<br />

curtail or restrain."<br />

APPEAL LAST DECEMBER<br />

The constitutional attack on the censorship<br />

laws here went to the supreme couit<br />

last December on an appeal from the Fulton<br />

superior court. The plaintiff in the<br />

court action, K. Gordon Murray Productions,<br />

Inc., a motion picture distributing<br />

firm, sought in superior coui-t to enjoin<br />

the city censors from preventing the showing<br />

of the films, "Wasted Lives" and "The<br />

Birth of Twins," and to have declared unconstitutional<br />

the city censorship laws.<br />

Fulton Judge Ralph Pharr upheld the city<br />

demurrers in December, and the K. Gordon<br />

Murray Productions began its appeal to the<br />

higher court. The company argued that<br />

the ordinance failed to set up any standards<br />

for censorship, "but permits the<br />

Board of Censors to arbitrarily ban or permit<br />

the showing of any film for any<br />

reasons." They also charged that the<br />

ordinance allowed the Board of Censors to<br />

act as "judge and prosecutor and did not<br />

establish any safeguards to prevent the<br />

Board from acting arbitrarily."<br />

The state supreme court commented on<br />

the opinion and its "far-reaching" implications<br />

resulting from its decision, saying,<br />

As individual citizens, we hate to see the<br />

vouth of this state subjected to all the evil<br />

influence that obscene pictures might exert<br />

uijon them. But as trusted judges, we have<br />

no alternative to saying, thus sayeth the<br />

Constitution, and we cheerfully obey."<br />

Justice Candler, who cast the one dissenting<br />

vote, said that "freedom of speech is<br />

not an ab.solute right under the state or<br />

U.S. Constitution, and that freedom of<br />

.speech does not preclude a municipality<br />

from protecting its people against the<br />

dangers resulting from public display of<br />

obscene or licentious pictures or any pictures<br />

which might adversely affect the<br />

peace, health, morals and good order."<br />

Atlanta's movie censor, Mrs. Christine<br />

Gilliam, has had nothing to say, or at least<br />

for the present, on the ruling made by the<br />

state supreme court. No longer will Mrs.<br />

Gilliam be authorized by city laws to determine<br />

what movies will be shown in the<br />

city of Atlanta, unless the Georgia supreme<br />

court's ruling can be overruled by the U.S.<br />

Supreme Court by an appeal. This still remains<br />

a possibility. Aubrey Milam, oldest<br />

veteran board member, having served 24<br />

years, said, "a moderate degree of censorship<br />

is needed, especially for younger people.<br />

An awful lot of obscenity creeps into<br />

things today." Milam cited foreign fUms,<br />

with emphasis on those made in France.<br />

"I think the board has done a good job.<br />

We're still going to keep watch on the<br />

pictures."<br />

Montcloir, N. J., Approves<br />

Ban on "Indecent' Films<br />

MONTCLAIR, N.J.—The city commission<br />

has approved a ban on the showing of<br />

motion pictures which are deemed "indecent,<br />

lewd and obscene."<br />

In a 3-2 vote, the board of commissioners<br />

declared that any citizen has the right to<br />

take action against films that fall into that<br />

category. Under provisions of the law, any<br />

citizen can sign a complaint against the<br />

theatre showiiig the "obscene" film and<br />

have it temporarily banned, pending court<br />

action.<br />

The adoption of the ban followed the<br />

controversy last month over the exhibition<br />

of the film, "Les Liaisons Dangereuses," a<br />

French motion picture, which was at the<br />

Bellevue Theatre.<br />

The censorship bill was advanced by<br />

Angelo J. Fortunato, city public safety director,<br />

and received the endorsement of<br />

mayor Harold Osborne and commissioner<br />

Howard Brundage. Opposing it were commissioners<br />

Robert G. Hooke and Robert<br />

Miller.<br />

Some 600 citizens attended the board's<br />

meeting in the Hillside High School. A<br />

show of hands at the session indicated<br />

about 400 of those in attendance were in<br />

favor of adoption of the ban.<br />

After police confiscated the French film,<br />

Astor Pictures of New York chartered buses<br />

to take local residents to New York so they<br />

could see the movie for free.<br />

BOXOFFICE April 16, 1962 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!