Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
'Problem Parents' Scored<br />
By Mrs. Twyman in Mich.<br />
GRAND RAPIDS, MICH —A strong<br />
position<br />
against government censorship and<br />
legal classification was taken by Mrs. Margaret<br />
Twyman, director of community relations,<br />
in an address to the Federation of<br />
Motion Picture Councils in the Pantlind<br />
Hotel here Wednesday (UK<br />
Mrs. Twyman said the motion picture<br />
Industry was faced with a new problem<br />
which might be termed "problem parents."<br />
She said such parents were those who<br />
would not make the necessary effort to determine<br />
from reliable sources which pictures<br />
were playing at the local theatre and<br />
to decide for themselves, based on available<br />
information, whether or not they wanted<br />
their children to see a given picture.<br />
"Certainly we want suitable films for the<br />
mature mind as well as film for the entire<br />
family," Mrs. Twyman said. "Parents must<br />
make the effort to select films for their<br />
children. There need be no embarrassment<br />
or disappointment on the part of any parent<br />
willing to accept his responsibility<br />
in this area."<br />
Another speaker on the program was<br />
Taylor Mills, public relations director of<br />
the MPAA, who discussed motion picture<br />
advertising and the Advertising Code. He<br />
stressed the fact that today's film advertising<br />
must be factual as well as developing<br />
the desire to see the pictm-e.<br />
Mills said that because many films today<br />
were designated for a mature audience, it<br />
was imperative that the advertising be directed<br />
especially to that audience. He said<br />
every reader of film advertising should be<br />
reasonably certain concerning the type of<br />
picture offered, thus allowing the reader to<br />
make up his mind as to whether he wanted<br />
to invest in this entertainment. The most<br />
effective advertising is that which arrests<br />
the attention and creates a desire to see<br />
a picture, he said.<br />
MPC Federation Award<br />
Goes to 'Parent Trap'<br />
GRAND RAPIDS, MICH.—Walt Disney's<br />
"The Parent Trap" was awarded the Federation<br />
of Motion Picture Councils citation as<br />
the best family picture of the year at the<br />
concluding banquet of the federation's twoday<br />
conference here Wednesday and<br />
Thursday ill, 12).<br />
Tlie award was accepted, in behalf of<br />
Disney, by Frank Jones, Buena 'Vista manager<br />
at Detroit. Disney won the same<br />
award last year for "Pollyanna."<br />
A special award went to Spyros Skouras,<br />
president of 20th Centuo'-Fox. It was accepted<br />
by Sol Gordon, publicity and advertising<br />
director of the 20th-Pox Chicago<br />
office.<br />
Over 300 representatives of motion picture<br />
councils in the nation attended the<br />
conference at the Hotel Pantlind. A highlight<br />
was a panel on "Previewer—Critic<br />
or Censor?" with preview chairmen of ten<br />
different councils participating. It was<br />
moderated by Mrs. S. Juhan Colyer, federation<br />
preview chairman and evaluator of<br />
the Green Sheet.<br />
Representing the industry at the conference<br />
were Milton H. London, executive<br />
director of National Allied; Alden Smith,<br />
Cooperative Theatres of Michigan, and<br />
Margaret Twyman, director of community<br />
relations for the MPAA.<br />
Georgia High Court Rules<br />
Against Censor Board<br />
ATLANTA — The end of the city of<br />
Atlanta's movie censorship laws was<br />
marked Saturday i7) when the Georgia<br />
supreme coui-t in a 6-1 majority declared<br />
them to be in violation of the state constitution.<br />
Georgia's highest court's hLstoric<br />
action as good as put the Altanta Board of<br />
Censors out of business who had heretofore<br />
required all movies to be shown in the<br />
metropolitan area to first have their<br />
approval.<br />
MANY PRECEDENTS CITED<br />
The court, in handing down its<br />
decision,<br />
said, "The chapter and ordinance which<br />
provide for city pei-mits as prerequisites to<br />
exhibiting any picture offend the constitution<br />
and are void."<br />
Only one of the seven justices cast a dissenting<br />
vote. Justice Thomas S. Candler.<br />
Justices Carleton Mobley and Joseph Quillian<br />
concurred "specially" meaning more<br />
can be expected from them on this subject<br />
a little later.<br />
Chief Justice W. H. Duckworth, who<br />
wrote the 6-1 majority opinion, cited a<br />
large number of legal precedents which<br />
supported the Georgia court's view that<br />
there is no merit in the attack on the censorship<br />
laws "upwn the ground that 'forbidding<br />
the showing of any picture without its<br />
having been approved by the censor offends<br />
the U.S. Constitution.' The court held<br />
that the city's censorsliip laws in its<br />
charter and ordinances violated the<br />
Georgia constitution, and not the U.S.<br />
Constitution." Justice Duckworth said,<br />
"The chai-ter and ordinance provision, requiring<br />
uispection of the protected pictures,<br />
and also requiring a permit from the<br />
city authorities before any picture can be<br />
exhibited in the theatre, violates the state<br />
constitution. The words of the constitution<br />
reading, 'no law shall ever be passed to cm--<br />
tail or restrain,' are irreconcilable with any<br />
law, including a city ordinance, that does<br />
curtail or restrain."<br />
APPEAL LAST DECEMBER<br />
The constitutional attack on the censorship<br />
laws here went to the supreme couit<br />
last December on an appeal from the Fulton<br />
superior court. The plaintiff in the<br />
court action, K. Gordon Murray Productions,<br />
Inc., a motion picture distributing<br />
firm, sought in superior coui-t to enjoin<br />
the city censors from preventing the showing<br />
of the films, "Wasted Lives" and "The<br />
Birth of Twins," and to have declared unconstitutional<br />
the city censorship laws.<br />
Fulton Judge Ralph Pharr upheld the city<br />
demurrers in December, and the K. Gordon<br />
Murray Productions began its appeal to the<br />
higher court. The company argued that<br />
the ordinance failed to set up any standards<br />
for censorship, "but permits the<br />
Board of Censors to arbitrarily ban or permit<br />
the showing of any film for any<br />
reasons." They also charged that the<br />
ordinance allowed the Board of Censors to<br />
act as "judge and prosecutor and did not<br />
establish any safeguards to prevent the<br />
Board from acting arbitrarily."<br />
The state supreme court commented on<br />
the opinion and its "far-reaching" implications<br />
resulting from its decision, saying,<br />
As individual citizens, we hate to see the<br />
vouth of this state subjected to all the evil<br />
influence that obscene pictures might exert<br />
uijon them. But as trusted judges, we have<br />
no alternative to saying, thus sayeth the<br />
Constitution, and we cheerfully obey."<br />
Justice Candler, who cast the one dissenting<br />
vote, said that "freedom of speech is<br />
not an ab.solute right under the state or<br />
U.S. Constitution, and that freedom of<br />
.speech does not preclude a municipality<br />
from protecting its people against the<br />
dangers resulting from public display of<br />
obscene or licentious pictures or any pictures<br />
which might adversely affect the<br />
peace, health, morals and good order."<br />
Atlanta's movie censor, Mrs. Christine<br />
Gilliam, has had nothing to say, or at least<br />
for the present, on the ruling made by the<br />
state supreme court. No longer will Mrs.<br />
Gilliam be authorized by city laws to determine<br />
what movies will be shown in the<br />
city of Atlanta, unless the Georgia supreme<br />
court's ruling can be overruled by the U.S.<br />
Supreme Court by an appeal. This still remains<br />
a possibility. Aubrey Milam, oldest<br />
veteran board member, having served 24<br />
years, said, "a moderate degree of censorship<br />
is needed, especially for younger people.<br />
An awful lot of obscenity creeps into<br />
things today." Milam cited foreign fUms,<br />
with emphasis on those made in France.<br />
"I think the board has done a good job.<br />
We're still going to keep watch on the<br />
pictures."<br />
Montcloir, N. J., Approves<br />
Ban on "Indecent' Films<br />
MONTCLAIR, N.J.—The city commission<br />
has approved a ban on the showing of<br />
motion pictures which are deemed "indecent,<br />
lewd and obscene."<br />
In a 3-2 vote, the board of commissioners<br />
declared that any citizen has the right to<br />
take action against films that fall into that<br />
category. Under provisions of the law, any<br />
citizen can sign a complaint against the<br />
theatre showiiig the "obscene" film and<br />
have it temporarily banned, pending court<br />
action.<br />
The adoption of the ban followed the<br />
controversy last month over the exhibition<br />
of the film, "Les Liaisons Dangereuses," a<br />
French motion picture, which was at the<br />
Bellevue Theatre.<br />
The censorship bill was advanced by<br />
Angelo J. Fortunato, city public safety director,<br />
and received the endorsement of<br />
mayor Harold Osborne and commissioner<br />
Howard Brundage. Opposing it were commissioners<br />
Robert G. Hooke and Robert<br />
Miller.<br />
Some 600 citizens attended the board's<br />
meeting in the Hillside High School. A<br />
show of hands at the session indicated<br />
about 400 of those in attendance were in<br />
favor of adoption of the ban.<br />
After police confiscated the French film,<br />
Astor Pictures of New York chartered buses<br />
to take local residents to New York so they<br />
could see the movie for free.<br />
BOXOFFICE April 16, 1962 11