19.10.2014 Views

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Session<br />

53- ELISA AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF<br />

BRUCELLOSIS IN SHEEP.<br />

Jalali, A. 1 , Hemmatzadeh, F. 2 , Momtaz, H. 2 and Nilsson, E. 1 . (1) Svanova Biotech AB, Sweden. (2)<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tehran University, Iran.<br />

<strong>Brucellosis</strong> is an important zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Brucella,<br />

affecting various animal species. Although many countries have succeeded to control<br />

this disease in cattle, brucellosis in small ruminants has been less favourable.<br />

However, due to the economical and health impacts of this issue, there is a need for<br />

easily standardized and performed tests for this purpose.<br />

Two antibody ELISA’s (SVANOVIR), one indirect and one competitive were<br />

evaluated on sheep sera. In the first stage 150 negative (Sweden) and 120 positive<br />

(Iran and Israel) samples were tested on both assays. The samples were<br />

characterized by serology and/or cultivation. The results were as follows:<br />

Assay Sensitivity Specificity Cut off<br />

Indirect ELISA 94,3 100 PP >= 15<br />

Competitive ELISA 100 100 PI >= 30<br />

To confirm validity of the chosen cut off, the trial was repeated on 1094 sheep<br />

samples from herds in Iran. All samples were tested with Rose Bengal (RBT), Wright<br />

and 2-ME according to standard procedures. Out of the 1094 sheep samples, 83 %<br />

were negative in all three conventional assays. Out of these only 5 % was positive in<br />

the C-ELISA whereas 41 % in the I-ELISA. Out of the 14 % tested positive in all three<br />

agglutination tests, 97 % was positive with the I-ELISA and 69% with the C-ELISA.<br />

Two percent of the total material showed discrepancies in the agglutination tests.<br />

However, in this group the specificity of the C-ELISA against 2-ME was 82%. The<br />

study shows that the ELISA tests could be suitable replacements for the conventional<br />

tests for screening as well as for confirmatory applications.<br />

54- EVALUATION OF THE ELISA IN DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS IN PIGS.<br />

K. Szulowski, W. Iwaniak, J. Pilaszek. Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research<br />

Institute in Pulawy, Poland.<br />

According to Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines the<br />

serological methods recommended in diagnosis of brucellosis in pigs are ELISA,<br />

BBAT and FPA. The aim of the studies was to evaluate the properties of the indirect<br />

ELISA (I-ELISA) used in diagnosis of swine brucellosis in Poland. In the test the<br />

microplates coated with the “smooth” lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS) obtained from the<br />

strain S19 of Brucella abortus, the conjugate of anti-swine immunoglobulins with<br />

horseradish peroxidase and ABTS with H 2 O 2 as the substrate, were used. The<br />

controls of the ELISA kit consisted of: strong positive swine serum (S++), weak<br />

positive serum (S+) and negative serum (S-) prepared respectively on the base of<br />

sera from pigs coming from Brucella infected herds and pigs free of brucellosis. In<br />

the examination 105 sera from pigs from 3 infected herds, 92895 sera from healthy<br />

pigs monitored for brucellosis from territory of Poland and 3662 sera from imported<br />

pigs were used. Besides ELISA the traditional methods such as RBT, CFT and<br />

additionally for some samples, SAT and 2-ME were used. Of pigs from infected herds<br />

102 sera reacted positively in the ELISA, whereas 95 sera were positive in the RBT<br />

and 98 in the CFT. In the screening surveys only 11 positive results were obtained in<br />

<strong>Brucellosis</strong> <strong>2003</strong> International Research Conference<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!