19.10.2014 Views

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Short Oral Communications<br />

Diagnosis in animal brucellosis<br />

DO1- SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE OF YOUNG AND ADULT SHEEP TO<br />

CONJUCTIVAL VACCINATION WITH REV-1 VACCINE ASSESSED WITH THE<br />

CLASSICAL AND RECENT TESTS.<br />

A. Stournara 1 , A. Minas 1 , E. Bourtzi-Chatzopoulou 2 , G. Koptopoulos 2 , E. Petridou 2 , K. Sarris 2 . (1)<br />

Veterinary Laboratory of Larissa, National Reference Laboratory of <strong>Brucellosis</strong>, 411 10, Larissa,<br />

Greece. (2) Laboratory of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,<br />

Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, 54 124, Thessaloniki, Greece.<br />

The serological response of young and adult sheep to conjuctival vaccination<br />

with REV-1 vaccine was assessed with the use of classical and new serological tests.<br />

One hundred and six (106) adult sheep and forty-nine (49) lambs 3-6 months old,<br />

reared in a brucellosis officially free flock, were used for this purpose. A normal dose<br />

(1?10 9 cfu) of REV-1 vaccine was administered conjunctivaly to all animals. Prior to<br />

vaccination the animals were bled and the sera collected were tested with the<br />

serological tests approved for the diagnosis of ovine and caprine brucellosis as Rose<br />

Bengal test (RBT) and Complement Fixation Test (CFT) ( Directive 91/68 EEC) . The<br />

sera were tested also with the most sensitive modified Rose Bengal test (m-RBT) (<br />

Blasco, 1994 , OIE, 2002) and new tests as, indirect Elisa (i-ELISA) , (Jimenez de<br />

Bagues, 1991), competitive ELISA (c-ELISA) (Nielsen, 1995) and Flourescence<br />

Polarization Assay (FPA) (Nielsen, 1996). The results obtained by all tests performed<br />

were negative. The animals were bled at day 21, 42, 63, 91, 125, 159, 223 and 330<br />

post vaccination and the sera collected were tested with the tests mentioned above.<br />

The performed tests revealed that three weeks (21 days) post vaccination the<br />

seropositive adult animals to RBT, m-RBT, CFT, c-ELISA, i-ELISA and FPA<br />

represented the 100%, 100%, 98%, 88,6%, 87% and 83% of vaccinated adult<br />

animals respectively, while the seropositive lambs to these tests represented the<br />

100%, 100%, 89,7%, 79,59%, 18,36 and 18,36% of vaccinated young animals<br />

respectively. Forty seven weeks (330 days) post vaccination the seropositive adult<br />

animals to RBT, m-RBT, CFT, c-ELISA, i-ELISA and FPA represented the 3,77%,<br />

11,32%, 1,88%, 2,83%, 33% and 2,83% of vaccinated adult animals respectively . At<br />

the same time seropositive lambs that represented the 2,04% of vaccinated young<br />

animals were found with m-RBT, while the results obtained from all the other tests<br />

were negative.<br />

DO2- EVALUATION OF THE COMPETITIVE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY AND<br />

POLARIZED FLUORESCENCE ASSAY FOR BRUCELLOSIS DIAGNOSIS IN<br />

GOATS FROM NORTHERN MÉXICO.<br />

C. Ramirez-Pfeiffer 1 , A. C. Snydelaar-Hardwicke 2 , F. Acosta-Martínez 2 , J. Vázquez-Villanueva 2 , E.<br />

Luna-Martínez 3 , R. Gómez-Flores 4 , K. Nielsen 5 . (1) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y<br />

Agropecuarias, CIRNE, C. E. Aldama, México. (2) Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Fac. Med.<br />

Veterinaria y Zoot., México. (3) Secretaría de Agricultura Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y<br />

Alimentación, SENASICA, México. (4) Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Fac. Ciencias<br />

Biológicas, México. (5)Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Animal Disease Research Institute,<br />

Canada.<br />

A preliminary study to determine the effectiveness of the fluorescence<br />

polarized assay (FPA) and competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA) in detecting<br />

negative serums was performed. Results were compared with those obtained with<br />

the card test using 3% of antigen concentration. Procedures and reagents used were<br />

<strong>Brucellosis</strong> <strong>2003</strong> International Research Conference<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!