Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS
Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS
Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Short Oral Communications<br />
Diagnosis in animal brucellosis<br />
DO1- SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE OF YOUNG AND ADULT SHEEP TO<br />
CONJUCTIVAL VACCINATION WITH REV-1 VACCINE ASSESSED WITH THE<br />
CLASSICAL AND RECENT TESTS.<br />
A. Stournara 1 , A. Minas 1 , E. Bourtzi-Chatzopoulou 2 , G. Koptopoulos 2 , E. Petridou 2 , K. Sarris 2 . (1)<br />
Veterinary Laboratory of Larissa, National Reference Laboratory of <strong>Brucellosis</strong>, 411 10, Larissa,<br />
Greece. (2) Laboratory of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,<br />
Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, 54 124, Thessaloniki, Greece.<br />
The serological response of young and adult sheep to conjuctival vaccination<br />
with REV-1 vaccine was assessed with the use of classical and new serological tests.<br />
One hundred and six (106) adult sheep and forty-nine (49) lambs 3-6 months old,<br />
reared in a brucellosis officially free flock, were used for this purpose. A normal dose<br />
(1?10 9 cfu) of REV-1 vaccine was administered conjunctivaly to all animals. Prior to<br />
vaccination the animals were bled and the sera collected were tested with the<br />
serological tests approved for the diagnosis of ovine and caprine brucellosis as Rose<br />
Bengal test (RBT) and Complement Fixation Test (CFT) ( Directive 91/68 EEC) . The<br />
sera were tested also with the most sensitive modified Rose Bengal test (m-RBT) (<br />
Blasco, 1994 , OIE, 2002) and new tests as, indirect Elisa (i-ELISA) , (Jimenez de<br />
Bagues, 1991), competitive ELISA (c-ELISA) (Nielsen, 1995) and Flourescence<br />
Polarization Assay (FPA) (Nielsen, 1996). The results obtained by all tests performed<br />
were negative. The animals were bled at day 21, 42, 63, 91, 125, 159, 223 and 330<br />
post vaccination and the sera collected were tested with the tests mentioned above.<br />
The performed tests revealed that three weeks (21 days) post vaccination the<br />
seropositive adult animals to RBT, m-RBT, CFT, c-ELISA, i-ELISA and FPA<br />
represented the 100%, 100%, 98%, 88,6%, 87% and 83% of vaccinated adult<br />
animals respectively, while the seropositive lambs to these tests represented the<br />
100%, 100%, 89,7%, 79,59%, 18,36 and 18,36% of vaccinated young animals<br />
respectively. Forty seven weeks (330 days) post vaccination the seropositive adult<br />
animals to RBT, m-RBT, CFT, c-ELISA, i-ELISA and FPA represented the 3,77%,<br />
11,32%, 1,88%, 2,83%, 33% and 2,83% of vaccinated adult animals respectively . At<br />
the same time seropositive lambs that represented the 2,04% of vaccinated young<br />
animals were found with m-RBT, while the results obtained from all the other tests<br />
were negative.<br />
DO2- EVALUATION OF THE COMPETITIVE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY AND<br />
POLARIZED FLUORESCENCE ASSAY FOR BRUCELLOSIS DIAGNOSIS IN<br />
GOATS FROM NORTHERN MÉXICO.<br />
C. Ramirez-Pfeiffer 1 , A. C. Snydelaar-Hardwicke 2 , F. Acosta-Martínez 2 , J. Vázquez-Villanueva 2 , E.<br />
Luna-Martínez 3 , R. Gómez-Flores 4 , K. Nielsen 5 . (1) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y<br />
Agropecuarias, CIRNE, C. E. Aldama, México. (2) Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Fac. Med.<br />
Veterinaria y Zoot., México. (3) Secretaría de Agricultura Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y<br />
Alimentación, SENASICA, México. (4) Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Fac. Ciencias<br />
Biológicas, México. (5)Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Animal Disease Research Institute,<br />
Canada.<br />
A preliminary study to determine the effectiveness of the fluorescence<br />
polarized assay (FPA) and competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA) in detecting<br />
negative serums was performed. Results were compared with those obtained with<br />
the card test using 3% of antigen concentration. Procedures and reagents used were<br />
<strong>Brucellosis</strong> <strong>2003</strong> International Research Conference<br />
59