19.10.2014 Views

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session<br />

14- HIGH PREVALENCE OF SEROVAR 3 OF Brucella abortus IN THE REGION<br />

OF CANTABRIA (SPAIN).<br />

J. Agüero 1 , A. Ocampo 1 , C. Marín 2 , G. Gradillas 3 and J.M. García-Lobo 1 . (1) Departamento de<br />

Biología Molecular. Universidad de Cantabria, Spain. (2) Servicio de Sanidad Animal. Diputación<br />

General de Aragón, Spain. (3) Servicio de Laboratorio y Control. Dirección General de Ganadería.<br />

Gobierno de Cantabria. Spain.<br />

Animal brucellosis is still highly prevalent in the region of Cantabria, which is<br />

located in the North of Spain. The main incidence is in cattle, where the current<br />

estimation of the presence of the disease is that of 0.85%.<br />

We present herein our data resulting from the characterization of a wide<br />

number of field isolates of Brucella spp, mainly from cattle, collected over the last<br />

three years. The identification of species and biovars were determined both by<br />

phenotypic and genotypic methods. For the phenotypic characterization we<br />

performed the classical techniques addressed to this aim: dyes sensibility, CO 2<br />

requeriment, SH 2 production, phage typing and agglutination with monoespecific<br />

sera. The genotypic studies were accomplished by PCR analysis, using<br />

oligonucleotides capable of distinguishing the species and or biovars isolated from<br />

the different samples. The strains were further characterized by RFLP analysis using<br />

the insertion sequence IS711 as genetic marker.<br />

The majority of the strains analyzed proved to be belonging to the biovar 3 of<br />

B. abortus, and exhibited special genetic features which were not observed in the<br />

reference strain for this biovar. On the basis of these results, the possibility of the<br />

existence of an endemic clone of B. abortus in this region is discussed.<br />

15- ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF Brucella canis ISOLATED IN KOREA.<br />

Jongwan Kim 1 , Jongsam An 1 , Jaehak Kim 1 , Youngju Lee 1 , Jongman Kim 1 , Yiseok Joo 1 , Ryunbin Tak 2 .<br />

(1) National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service, (2) College of Veterinary Medicine,<br />

Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea.<br />

Antimicrobial treatment of canine brucellosis has been shown variable results,<br />

including relapse of brucellosis. The purpose of this study was to test the in vitro<br />

susceptibility of 15 antimicrobial agents against 3 and 52 isolates of Brucella canis<br />

isolated from dogs in Korea in 1994 and 2002, respectively. Minimal inhibitory<br />

concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined<br />

using conventional microdilution broth methods. Tetracyclines (minocycline,<br />

doxycline) and aminoglycosides (gentamicin, streptomycin) showed greatest<br />

suppressive activity against Brucella canis (MICs 0.06-0.5 µg/ml). Fluoroquinolones<br />

(norfloxacin, ciprofloxacine) and rifampin showed equivalent activity (MICs 32 µg/ml).<br />

Interestingly, recently isolated 52 strains showed 16-64 times higher macrolides<br />

(erythromycin, spiramycin, tylosin) MICs than 3 strains isolated in 1994. MBC<br />

analysis revealed aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones showed greatest<br />

bactericidal activity (MBCs 0.12-1.0 µg/ml), while beta-lactam antibiotics<br />

(ampicillin,cephalothin), lincosamides, and sulfisoxazole showed least bactericidal<br />

activity (MBCs 16->32 µg/ml). Interestingly, tetracyclines showed highest MBC/MIC<br />

ratio (128X). In addition, macrolides showed broad range of MIC and MBC.<br />

96<br />

<strong>Brucellosis</strong> <strong>2003</strong> International Research Conference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!