19.10.2014 Views

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session<br />

samples tested positive for brucellosis (B. suis). In order to investigate brucellosis in<br />

further detail, the spleen and the reproductive organs (accessory sexual glands and<br />

the uterus respectively) have been collected in the second hunting season. Disease<br />

prevalence or freedom from disease respectively will be discussed for brucellosis<br />

among wild boars in Switzerland.<br />

18- SEROLOGICAL SURVEY FOR REINDEER (Rangifer tarandus tarandus)<br />

BRUCELLOSIS IN FINLAND.<br />

E. Seuna 1 and V. Hirvelä-Koski 2 . Department of Bacteriology, Helsinki (1), Oulu Regional Unit (2),<br />

National Veterinary and Food Research Institute EELA, Finland.<br />

Rangiferine brucellosis caused by Brucella suis biotype 4 has been reported in<br />

circumpolar areas, North America and Russia, but not in Scandinavia. No information<br />

is available of the occurrence of rangiferine brucellosis in Russian areas adjacent to<br />

Finland. There are 57 reindeer herding co-operative districts in the northern part of<br />

Finland. Serological surveys were conducted in 1997-1998 and 2001-2002 to study<br />

the occurrence of Brucella antibodies in semi-domesticated reindeer. The total<br />

number of reindeer in 1997-1998 was about 286 000, while in 2001-2002 the figure<br />

was 297 000. 2 307 serum samples from 14 districts and 1 676 samples from 39 of<br />

the 57 districts were collected at slaughter in 1997-1998 and 2001-2002,<br />

respectively. The samples were tested for Brucella antibodies using Rose Bengal<br />

Plate Agglutination Test in both surveys. No seropositive samples were detected.<br />

The negative results indicate that the prevalence of brucellosis was less than 0.13%<br />

in 1997-1998, and less than 0.18% in 2001-2002, with 95% confidence.<br />

19- PREVALENCE OF BRUCELLOSIS IN WILD SWINE (Sus scrofa) IN THE<br />

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA.<br />

Z.Cvetnic 1 , J. Toncic 2 , S. Spicic 1 , M. Lojkic 1 , S. Terzic 1 , L. Jemersic 1 , A. Humski 1 , M. Ocepek 3 and<br />

B.Krt 3 (1) Croatian Veterinary Institute Zagreb, Croatia. (2) Institute of Forestly, Jastrebarsko, Croatia.<br />

(3) Veterinary Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia.<br />

During 2001 and 2002 on seven localities in Croatia a survey on the<br />

prevalence of brucellosis in wild swine was carried out. The survey included 271<br />

(52.7%) female and 243 (47.3%) male animals between 7 months and 4 years of<br />

age. On that occasion 514 blood samples of wild swine were serologically analysed.<br />

For serological analysis Rose Bengal test (RBT), slow agglutination test (SAT),<br />

complement fixation test (CFT) and indirect enzyme immunoassay (iELISA) were<br />

used. In all of the wild swine from all of the localites investigated positive reactions to<br />

brucellosis were established. Most of the positive reactions were established by<br />

iELISA (13.6%), then by RBT (11.5%), CFT (10.5%) and SAT (8.9%). The samples of<br />

134 testes, 39 uteri and 5 fetuses of piglets were analysed bacteriologically.<br />

Brucellae spp. were isolated from 18 (10.1%9 samples that were collected from all of<br />

the localities investigated. The results of PCR using BRU-UP and BRU-LOW primers<br />

confirmed that all of the isolates were from Brucella spp. Genus, whereas, for the<br />

analysis of fragment IS 711 DNA multiplication using two specific primers (IS 711 and<br />

B. suis - specific primer) was carried out. In all the isolates investigated and in the<br />

standard cultures of B. suis biovar 1 (1330) and B. suis biovar 2 the product of<br />

98<br />

<strong>Brucellosis</strong> <strong>2003</strong> International Research Conference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!