19.10.2014 Views

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

Brucellosis 2003 proceedings - PHIDIAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session<br />

is difficult to obtain a good vaccine coverage in young animals under 8 month old, as<br />

Argentinean regulation states.<br />

84- EFFICACY OF S-RB51 VACCINE IN ADULT CATTLE.<br />

L. Samartino 1 , M. Fort 2 , S. Conde 1 , E. Salustio 1 . (1) INTA. Centro de Ciencias Veterinarias, Buenos<br />

Aires, Argentina. (2) Estación Experimental Anguil, La Pampa, Argentina.<br />

Strain B. abortus RB51 (S-RB51), was developed to protect cattle for<br />

brucellosis and the level of protection was comparable to S-19 (Am. J. Vet. Res.<br />

1996: 57, Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998: 59). Besides, the S-RB51 do not induce the<br />

production of antibodies even if it is applied multiple times ( Prev. Vet. Med. 2000:<br />

45). In this experiment we study the efficacy of S-RB51 applied for adult cattle which<br />

were calf vaccinated either with S-RB51 or S-19. Four groups of cattle were<br />

established: A:23 cows were vaccinated with S-19 and revaccinated with S-RB51. B:<br />

21 cows were vaccinated with S-RB51 and revaccinated with S- RB51 C: 28 cows<br />

were vaccinated with S-19 and revaccinated twice with S-RB51 D: 12 cows were not<br />

vaccinated. All animals were challenged in the middle of pregnancy with 2.1x10 7 B.<br />

abortus strain 2308 intraconjuntivally Serological studies were done using BPA, 2<br />

ME, CFand ELISA tests. Bacteriological studies were performed from aborted<br />

foetuses, vaginal swabs and milk. All cows vaccinated and revaccinated with S-19<br />

became seropositive but they remained negatives when were vaccinated and<br />

revaccinated with S-RB51. The number of abortions were 4, 3, 3 and 6 in groups A,<br />

B, C and D. Strain 2308 was recovery from 6, 5, 8 and 10 cows for the same groups<br />

and CF titres (1/40) were detected in 6, 6, 10 and 12 cows respectively 6 months<br />

post-challenged. These animals were considered infected. According to these results<br />

we did not see any differences in the efficacy among these combination of vaccines,<br />

however protection given by the vaccines was much better in groups A, B and C than<br />

the control group.<br />

85- ATYPICAL POST-VACCINATION SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE IN COWS<br />

REVACCINATED WITH Brucella abortus RB51 IN ENDEMIC BRUCELLOSIS<br />

AREAS OF MÉXICO.<br />

E. Díaz-Aparicio 1 , B. Arellano-Reynoso 1 , E. Herrera 1 , M. Leal 2 , and F. Suárez-Güemes 2 . (1) Instituto<br />

Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. México-Toluca Km. 15.5, Cuajimalpa,<br />

México, DF. 05110. México. (2) Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia Universidad Nacional<br />

Autónoma de México. México.<br />

It is know that RB51 vaccination does not induce antibodies, that interfere with<br />

diagnosis, due to this fact, any positive reaction is considered as infection, however,<br />

we observed in cattle revaccinated with RB51, animals without infection, that were<br />

serologically positive. The aim of this work was to elucidate which antibodies were<br />

present in these animals with an “atypical” response. Sera samples were collected<br />

from an infected dairy herd, ten sera from each group were used, RB51 vaccinated<br />

groups: 1 card (CT) and rivanol (RT) negative; 2 CT positive, RT negative; 3 CT<br />

and RT positive (1:50 or 1:100); 4 CT and RT positive (1:400). RB51 revaccinated<br />

groups: 5 CT positive, RT negative; 6 CT and RT positive (1:50 or 1:100). Positive<br />

group with B. abortus isolation, and negative non-vaccinated group. All vaccinated<br />

<strong>Brucellosis</strong> <strong>2003</strong> International Research Conference<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!