19.10.2014 Views

Reports - United Nations Development Programme

Reports - United Nations Development Programme

Reports - United Nations Development Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNTRY EVALUATION: ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS – TURKEY<br />

Foreword<br />

The Assessment of <strong>Development</strong> Results (ADR) report for Turkey<br />

presents findings by the UNDP’s Evaluation Office through the work of<br />

its ADR Evaluation Team in January 2004. It represents an important,<br />

integral part of the UNDP’s Results Based Management (RBM) system,<br />

which focuses on the UNDP’s contribution to broader development results<br />

and outcomes. The ADR is an independent, forward-looking assessment<br />

of UNDP support in the last five to seven years, and is designed to<br />

inform future programme directions. The focus is on assessing the<br />

UNDP’s contribution to the development priorities of Turkey based on<br />

outcomes in core thematic areas of support, the lessons learned, and<br />

identification of possible areas of future support.<br />

This ADR concludes that, like Turkey itself, the UNDP programme is at<br />

an important crossroads. In that context, it states that the UNDP has an<br />

important role to play in the present and future Turkey, and highlights a<br />

number of results produced in the key thematic areas of governance, poverty,<br />

gender, environment and crisis response. The Report also suggests,<br />

however, that a further focus on these core thematic areas, implemented<br />

through a strong combination of international and national expertise,<br />

would further enhance the UNDP’s comparative advantages. In terms of<br />

strategic issues related to the delivery of the programme, the Report<br />

suggests that activities where the UNDP has a purely administrative<br />

involvement should be avoided, that there is a need to reduce the potential<br />

for “layering” in execution and implementation arrangements between the<br />

UNDP and the actual project activities on the ground, and that the UNDP<br />

needs to monitor and evaluate the outcomes of its interventions more<br />

systematically. At this crossroads, renewal of partnerships for substantive<br />

programme collaboration as well as financial contributions is needed,<br />

focusing on core thematic areas, and the core partnership with the Turkish<br />

Government will be the key entry point for all such endeavours.<br />

In researching and preparing this ADR, the UNDP Evaluation Office<br />

is greatly indebted to the ADR Evaluation Team Leader Mr. Johannes<br />

Linn, as well as to Professor Dr. Ayşe Ayata, Mr. Rajeev Pillay and<br />

Mr. Knut Ostby, the ADR Evaluation Team members and key contributors<br />

to the Report. Other important contributions were made through the<br />

in-depth studies on regional disparities and poverty, and on local<br />

governance and capacity building, conducted by Prof. Dr. Yusuf Ziya<br />

Özcan, and by Prof. Dr. Çelik Aruoba with Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nesrin Algan<br />

and Mr. Tezcan Abay, respectively. Within the Evaluation Office, the<br />

preparation of this Report was facilitated by technical and administrative<br />

support from Mr. Anish Pradhan and Ms. Elvira Larrain. Mr. Fa-Tai<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!