22.10.2014 Views

annual report/2006 - University of Melbourne

annual report/2006 - University of Melbourne

annual report/2006 - University of Melbourne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

esearch and<br />

research training/<br />

Research Performance<br />

Since 1996, the <strong>University</strong> has<br />

consistently ranked first or second on<br />

all major national research indicators,<br />

namely, total income, publications,<br />

research higher degree (RHD) load and<br />

RHD completions. These indicators are<br />

used by the Department <strong>of</strong> Education,<br />

Science and Training (DEST) to allocate<br />

government funding for research and<br />

research training infrastructure. As<br />

indicated in Table 3, for 2005 (the latest<br />

data available), the <strong>University</strong> was<br />

ranked first in all <strong>of</strong> these key research<br />

performance parameters.<br />

Based on this research performance,<br />

the <strong>University</strong> was successful in gaining<br />

the highest allocation nationally <strong>of</strong><br />

the research block grant ($120 million<br />

representing an increase <strong>of</strong> 4.6 percent<br />

from 2005) comprised <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Institutional Grants Scheme (IGS)<br />

funding ($34 million),<br />

• Research Training Scheme (RTS)<br />

funding ($59.9 million) and<br />

• Research Infrastructure Block<br />

Grants Scheme (RIBGS) funding<br />

($26.1 million).<br />

Based on 2005 (the latest available<br />

comparative data), the <strong>University</strong>’s<br />

research income totalled $254.4 million<br />

(an increase <strong>of</strong> 22 percent), with<br />

$106.7 million <strong>of</strong> Australian Competitive<br />

Grants, $53.5 million from other public<br />

sector funding and $94.2 million<br />

in industry (including CRCs) and<br />

international support.<br />

In <strong>2006</strong>, for commencement in 2007,<br />

the <strong>University</strong> was awarded the highest<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> combined National Health<br />

and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)<br />

and ARC five-year funding.<br />

NHMRC performance was strong,<br />

with the <strong>University</strong> maintaining its top<br />

ranking for both NHMRC Project and<br />

Program Grants combined margin <strong>of</strong><br />

$35.5 million. Success in the Project<br />

Scheme (27 percent) was the highest<br />

in the Go8 (average 22 percent) and<br />

nationally (average 21 percent). New<br />

multi-year NHMRC project grants (85)<br />

and funding ($34.5 million) increased by<br />

20 percent and 12 percent respectively.<br />

Three NHMRC Program Grants were<br />

awarded to the <strong>University</strong> for 2007 with<br />

a total value <strong>of</strong> $32.4 million, compared<br />

with two grants and $23 million<br />

respectively for <strong>2006</strong>.<br />

Results in the ARC schemes were<br />

mixed. New multi-year ARC project grant<br />

funding <strong>of</strong> $28.6 million represented<br />

an increase <strong>of</strong> 13 percent (the second<br />

highest GO8 percentage increase)<br />

and $3.4 million on the previous year<br />

and resulted in an improved fourthplace<br />

ranking. Although the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> successful project grants increased<br />

slightly to 92, the success rate <strong>of</strong> 20.9<br />

percent was below the GO8 average<br />

<strong>of</strong> 23.7 percent. With regard to ARC<br />

infrastructure funding, the <strong>University</strong><br />

obtained the highest GO8 Linkage<br />

Infrastructure funding as administering<br />

institution <strong>of</strong> $4.6 million (more than<br />

double the 2005 total) but performed<br />

poorly in relation to ARC Linkage<br />

Project Grants (Round One) receiving<br />

$3.2 million resulting in a decrease <strong>of</strong> 29<br />

percent and a sixth place ranking. Across<br />

the schemes, there were considerable<br />

differences between faculties.<br />

To address this varied success in<br />

relation to ARC funding, an Action Plan<br />

providing for mentoring and target<br />

setting strategies was developed and<br />

implemented in late <strong>2006</strong>.<br />

The Veterinary Clinic and Hospital student teaching laboratory at the <strong>University</strong>’s Werribee campus is used for the demonstration <strong>of</strong> minor procedures. The high<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the Werribee facilities was an important factor in the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science being granted accreditation by the American Veterinary Medical<br />

Association in <strong>2006</strong>.<br />

The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melbourne</strong> Annual Report <strong>2006</strong><br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!