22.10.2014 Views

CERFACS CERFACS Scientific Activity Report Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2011

CERFACS CERFACS Scientific Activity Report Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2011

CERFACS CERFACS Scientific Activity Report Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DATA ASSIMILATION FOR ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY<br />

address the monitoring of air quality with MOCAGE-Valentina. The MOCAGE model has the advantage of<br />

offering the possibility to work on four nested domains, from global to local scale. Working with the regional<br />

domain is essential for the modelling of air quality in order to have a sufficient horizontal resolution. For<br />

computational reasons it is not possible to increase the resolution of the global domain up to scales useful<br />

for air quality studies. The Valentina system has thus been further developed to produce chemical analyses<br />

on the limited area covered by the regional version of MOCAGE.<br />

The first requirement of the MACC project was to produce analyses of the concentration at the surface<br />

of several key atmospheric components. The analyses had to use the surface measurements from groundbased<br />

stations available each day for the day before. As Valentina is able to assimilate only one chemical<br />

component, we selected the ozone molecule. This choice was driven by the fact that ozone is one of the most<br />

observed species and because ozone is actively involved in air pollution. We decided to use the full chemical<br />

scheme of MOCAGE to obtain values for all the key atmospheric components of MACC. Because even if<br />

only ozone is assimilated, modifying the ozone concentration produces modifications in the concentration<br />

of other species due to the chemical links between them.<br />

The version of MOCAGE-Valentina that assimilates the surface ozone measurements was delivered to<br />

Météo-France/CNRM in mid-<strong>2010</strong> for a pre-operational daily production of the ozone surface analysis<br />

of the day before. We intensively used this pre-operational production to evaluate our analyses. In particular<br />

we have developed a monitoring suite that produces each day and each week some plots that are displayed<br />

on a web site to easily follow the evolution of the products. This monitoring allowed us to detect that we<br />

had to periodically update the error statistics both for the forecast and for the observation. We have then<br />

developed tools based on a posteriori diagnostics to automatically update the forecast and the observation<br />

error covariances matrices. The monitoring was also useful to point out the stations where the measurements<br />

were repeatedly not coherent with the model. This has lead to the creation of a blacklist for such stations,<br />

the blacklist being also automatically updated.<br />

(a) West-East length-scales<br />

(b) North-South length-scales<br />

FIG. 3.1: Diagnosed length-scales (in km) of the horizontal correlation of the forecast error, averaged on<br />

the period between 1 st and 10 th July <strong>2010</strong> : West-East (left) and North-South (right) length-scales.<br />

Among the work to ensure a good quality of the daily analysis of the surface ozone, we had begun a thorough<br />

investigation on the background error covariance matrix (BECM). In the operation suite, the background<br />

error variances comes from a posteriori diagnostics. The background error correlations are fixed in time and<br />

had never changed. We first diagnosed the BECM using an ensemble method with a methodology similar<br />

to the one we used for the global scale (see section 3). We have found that there are strong space and time<br />

variations in the background error covariances (Fig. 3.1), the use of constant values for the correlations as<br />

in the pre-operational suite is therefore not a good option [4]. We then derived several configurations of the<br />

78 <strong>Jan</strong>. <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>Dec</strong>. <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!