22.10.2014 Views

CERFACS CERFACS Scientific Activity Report Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2011

CERFACS CERFACS Scientific Activity Report Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2011

CERFACS CERFACS Scientific Activity Report Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DATA ASSIMILATION<br />

the potential vorticity field. But even if the BECM is a key-component, its evaluation has not yet been the<br />

object of thorough investigations for atmospheric chemistry assimilations.<br />

Meanwhile, in meteorology background (and analysis) errors were successfully assessed with ensemble<br />

data assimilation systems. Outputs of in a cycled assimilation system can produce an estimate of<br />

a flow-dependent BECM. The ensemble approach is not restrained to Kalman Filter methodologies.<br />

Useful information can statistically be extracted from an adequately perturbed ensemble variational data<br />

assimilation system. Up to now, the use of ensembles in combination with a variational assimilation<br />

scheme is relatively unexplored in atmospheric chemistry data assimilation. We have thus performed two<br />

studies to investigate the potential of an ensemble of atmospheric chemistry analyses to provide useful<br />

flow-dependent estimates of the background error variance and correlations, the first one with the fourdimensional<br />

variational assimilation global MOCAGE-Valentina suite [DA13] and the other with the threedimensional<br />

variational assimilation regional MOCAGE-Valentina suite [4].<br />

FIG. 3.3: Mean (top) and standard deviation (bottom) of the difference in terms of total ozone column<br />

(in %) between the OMI (independent) data and the model without assimilation (grey shaded area) or the<br />

analyses as a function of latitude, for <strong>Jan</strong>uary, April, July and October 2008. For the top panel, positive<br />

(negative) values stand for an underestimation (overestimation) of the model or the analyses compared to<br />

OMI data. The analyses differ from the modelling of the BECM : simple formulation (blue line) or from<br />

ensemble-based diagnostics (red line).<br />

The study with the global MOCAGE-Valentina suite showed that the analysis of the MLS ozone profiles<br />

(from the upper troposphere to the lower mesosphere) using all the components of the ensemble-estimated<br />

BECM produces ozone concentrations with a low biases and errors (Fig. 3.3). But estimating the BECM<br />

with ensemble methods has an important cost that could become unaffordable. We thus tried to use simpler<br />

methods to calculate the BECM. Replacing the estimated standard deviation by a standard deviation<br />

proportional to the background value is one of them. This simplification does not modify significantly<br />

the analysis quality. Replacing the estimated length-scales by a constant value is the second simplification<br />

we tried. This dramatically deteriorates the analysis quality for a few time periods. This simplification is<br />

thus irrelevant for analysing the stratospheric ozone.<br />

<strong>CERFACS</strong> ACTIVITY REPORT 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!