29.10.2014 Views

Volume 11 Issue 1 (February) - Australasian Society for Ultrasound ...

Volume 11 Issue 1 (February) - Australasian Society for Ultrasound ...

Volume 11 Issue 1 (February) - Australasian Society for Ultrasound ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advertisement<br />

“We now see a 50 percent overall<br />

reduction in the total exam time.”<br />

MPR of IVC right renal vein<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> imaging is a more efficient method<br />

<strong>for</strong> acquiring optimal 2D images. Physicians<br />

have the ability to obtain a variety of views<br />

that are richer than conventional imaging.<br />

Additionally, its greater accuracy improves<br />

the evaluation of relational anatomy by<br />

allowing radiologists to analyze surface<br />

anatomical structures and assess global<br />

motion and functional in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Improvements in efficiency and<br />

throughput equal faster scan time,<br />

positive impact on bottom line<br />

The ability to obtain volumes and review<br />

and manipulate those images at a later<br />

time is helping Freeman Hospital realize a<br />

reduction in overall examination time.<br />

“We’ve seen significant reductions in the<br />

time the patients spend on the exam table<br />

and the actual scan time,” said Dr. Elliott.<br />

“The question then is ‘are we spending<br />

a lot of time manipulating the images?’<br />

Having looked at all of our data, we’ve<br />

found that we are not spending a lot of<br />

time manipulating images. Even if you<br />

take into account not only the scan time,<br />

but also the patient’s time on the table,<br />

manipulation and measurement time, there<br />

is still an overall 50 percent reduction<br />

across all the studies that I’ve looked at,<br />

in the total exam time. This offers huge<br />

advantages in the way we work.”<br />

Dr. Elliott also cites the quicker scan times<br />

in helping improve the hospital’s patient<br />

throughput, which means a positive impact<br />

on the bottom line.<br />

“What we’re finding in terms of efficiency<br />

in the rooms is that we can have somebody<br />

doing a quick volume acquisition, another<br />

per<strong>for</strong>m the interpretation, while<br />

somebody else is getting another patient<br />

onto the bed and scanned. So we actually<br />

have an overlap now, which is enabling us<br />

to increase throughput in that one room.<br />

The acquisition phase of exams has the<br />

greatest potential <strong>for</strong> positive workflow<br />

impact. Conventional workflow requires<br />

the acquisition of 2D image after 2D image,<br />

followed by printing and archiving of the<br />

images. With volume imaging, volume<br />

interrogation follows volume acquisition,<br />

making it possible to shorten<br />

acquisition time.<br />

“We’d been using 3D imaging, seeing<br />

images of surface rendering, when I<br />

suddenly realized that we could actually<br />

take the volume of data and use it <strong>for</strong><br />

something we’d been doing every day in<br />

2D measuring,” said Dr. Elliott. “In one<br />

particular case, a simple abdominal aortic<br />

aneurism, I realized we had the potential<br />

to acquire volume data and do very simple<br />

measurements in a fraction of the time.”<br />

In addition to changing the way his<br />

department works, Dr. Elliott also cites<br />

the efficiency of volume imaging as a real<br />

benefit of the technology.<br />

“The biggest impact <strong>for</strong> me of using volume<br />

imaging is its efficiency. I can scan more<br />

patients in a unit of time and then review<br />

the data later. I can acquire the data<br />

instead of having to analyze it and measure<br />

images on the machine. I can also review<br />

data another day after the patient is long<br />

gone. So it offers the potential <strong>for</strong> me to<br />

change the way I work.”<br />

“It also has an impact in the UK where the<br />

sonographers are scanning and reporting<br />

independently or I’ve got trainees who<br />

are scanning,” continued Dr. Elliott. “A<br />

good example of that would be out of<br />

hours. There’s always that doubt with<br />

two-dimensional ultrasound when you’re<br />

scanning in fixed planes that something<br />

may have been missed. With 3D imaging,<br />

I know that they’ve acquired that data and<br />

we can go back and review that later<br />

as a team.<br />

Patient benefits<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> imaging also has a significant<br />

benefit to patients, who no longer endure<br />

lengthy scan times or the need <strong>for</strong> call<br />

backs as the result of a missed scan.<br />

“The first thing patients will probably<br />

notice, and ours do, is that some scans<br />

take a fraction of the time,” said Dr. Elliott.<br />

“We’re seeing a mean reduction between<br />

80 and 90 percent in time that the patient<br />

spends on the exam table. We operate<br />

a number of one-stop clinics, so patients<br />

coming to see a surgeon will come to<br />

see us <strong>for</strong> the ultrasound. For example,<br />

patients attending <strong>for</strong> abdominal aortic<br />

aneurism assessment are coming in <strong>for</strong><br />

surveillance scans and can then go straight<br />

to the clinic. Now, scan time is just a very<br />

small portion of the patient’s visit.<br />

ASUM <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Bulletin 2008 <strong>February</strong> <strong>11</strong> (1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!