NI 43-101 Technical report, Surface diamond drilling ... - Iamgold
NI 43-101 Technical report, Surface diamond drilling ... - Iamgold
NI 43-101 Technical report, Surface diamond drilling ... - Iamgold
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
R a r e E a r t h E l e m e n t E x p l o r a t i o n P r o g r a m M a r c h - 2 0 1 3<br />
W i n t e r - S u m m e r 2 0 1 2 P a g e | 131<br />
SAMREC-(Sect D:<br />
Criteria 3)<br />
Have the method and assumptions used to<br />
convert the Mineral Resource to an Ore<br />
Reserve (i.e. either by application of<br />
appropriate factors by optimization or by<br />
preliminary or detailed design) been<br />
<strong>report</strong>ed?<br />
Have the choice of, the nature and the<br />
appropriateness of the selected mining<br />
method(s), and other mining parameters<br />
(including associated design issues such as<br />
pre-strip, access, etc) been denoted?<br />
SME-(Criteria C.2)<br />
CIM- (<strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong>-Item<br />
25)<br />
JORC- (Sect D:<br />
Criteria 4)<br />
SAMREC-(Sect D:<br />
Criteria 4)<br />
SME-(Criteria D)<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
4.4<br />
Mining factors<br />
or<br />
assumptions<br />
Were the assumptions made regarding<br />
geotechnical parameters (e.g. pit slopes,<br />
stope sizes, etc), grade control and preproduction<br />
<strong>drilling</strong> denoted?<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
Were the major assumptions made as well as<br />
the Mineral Resource model used for pit<br />
optimization clearly described? (if<br />
appropriate)<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
Were the mining dilution factors, the mining<br />
recovery factors, and the minimum mining<br />
widths used, clearly denoted?<br />
No, Item 19<br />
LG, JFT<br />
Have the infrastructure requirements of the<br />
selected mining methods been stated?<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
Are the proposed metallurgical processes<br />
stated, and are they appropriate to process<br />
the described style of mineralization?<br />
CIM- (<strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong>-Item<br />
18)<br />
JORC- (Sect D:<br />
Criteria 5)<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
4.5<br />
Metallurgical<br />
factors or<br />
assumptions<br />
Are the proposed metallurgical processes<br />
well-tested technologies or novel in nature?<br />
Are the nature, amount and<br />
representativeness of metallurgical test work<br />
undertaken and the metallurgical recovery<br />
factors applied well denoted?<br />
SAMREC-(Sect D:<br />
Criteria 7&8)<br />
SME-(Criteria D)<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
Have any assumptions or allowances made<br />
for deleterious elements been <strong>report</strong>ed.<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
Has the existence of any bulk sample or pilot<br />
scale test work and the degree to which such<br />
samples are representative of the ore body as<br />
a whole been denoted?<br />
Yes, Item19,<br />
LG, JFT<br />
4.6<br />
Cost and<br />
Revenue<br />
Have the derivation of or assumptions made,<br />
regarding projected capital and operating<br />
CIM- (<strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong>-Item<br />
25)<br />
No, Item 19,<br />
3400, chemin du Columbium, St-Honoré-de-Chicoutimi, QC G0V 1L0 Canada – tel. : 418 673-4694 Fax : 418 673-3179<br />
E-mail : info.niobec@iamgold.com www.niobec.com
Change language