08.11.2014 Views

Vol 43 # 3 September 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 3 September 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 3 September 2011 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

190<br />

Re-appraisal of Vaginal Delivery after Previous Two Cesarean Sections<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

during a trial of labor [19,26] . There is increasing evidence<br />

that VBAC is safe and successful, and the dictum of once<br />

a CS, always a CS is no longer applicable [27] . Evidence<br />

is accumulating in western countries with regard to the<br />

safety and success of VBAC after multiple previous<br />

incisions in the lower segment [28] . Therefore, women in<br />

our community with two previous CS should at least<br />

be assessed individually, counseled and offered VBAC<br />

attempts.<br />

The objective of this study is to present evidence<br />

that trial of labor can be accomplished safely in women<br />

with two previous cesarean births. The obstetric and<br />

neonatal outcome of forty women with previous two<br />

CS with different indications and of unknown scars,<br />

and who, after counseling, preferred to have vaginal<br />

birth is presented.<br />

SUBJECTS AND METHODS<br />

This retrospective study included forty women<br />

with two previous CS, and who delivered vaginally at<br />

the Obstetric Unit of King Khalid University Hospital<br />

(KKUH), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, over a period of seven<br />

years (1993 - 1999). The study group was selected for<br />

trial of labor despite having two previous CS, based<br />

on criteria such as the request of the couple during<br />

antenatal counseling for vaginal delivery, the estimated<br />

fetal size of less than 3.8 kg by ultrasound scan and<br />

spontaneous onset of labor.<br />

Data was retrieved from medical records on<br />

maternal characteristics of nationality, age, height,<br />

parity, primary and repeat CS, previous vaginal<br />

delivery, and the indications for CS in the two previous<br />

cesarean deliveries. The primary CS is defined as<br />

delivery of a neonate by CS in mothers with no<br />

previous history of a CS and repeat CS is delivery of<br />

a neonate by CS following a previous CS. Other data<br />

included presentation of the fetus in labor, the use of<br />

analgesia and syntocinon during labor, gestational<br />

age at delivery, duration of labor and type of vaginal<br />

delivery. Neonatal characteristics such as baby weight,<br />

Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, admission to neonatal<br />

intensive care unit (NICU) and baby outcome were<br />

also retrieved.<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

Data was analyzed using STATPAC Gold statistical<br />

analysis package and is presented as percentages and<br />

means ( ± SD).<br />

RESULTS<br />

During the study period, a total of 30,378 deliveries<br />

were conducted at KKUH, including 3877 (12.8 %) by<br />

CS. Primary CS comprised of 1959 cases (6.5%), and<br />

repeat CS (> 2 CS) comprised of 1918 (6.3%) cases out<br />

of the total deliveries. Repeat CS included 498 women<br />

(1.6%) who had two CS. Of the 498 women with<br />

Table 1: Demographic and obstetric characteristics<br />

of 40 women with history of previous CSs delivered<br />

vaginally in the index pregnancy<br />

Characteristics<br />

Nationality<br />

Saudi<br />

Non-Saudi<br />

Age (yrs)<br />

< 35<br />

>35<br />

Height (cms)<br />

150<br />

Primary CS<br />

Repeat cesarean in 2nd pregnancy<br />

History of vaginal delivery<br />

Intervening vaginal delivery<br />

Spontaneous onset of labour<br />

Epidural analgesia<br />

Syntocinon augmentation<br />

Gestation at delivery (weeks)<br />

40<br />

Type of delivery<br />

SVD<br />

Assisted breech<br />

Age (years)<br />

Parity<br />

Height (cms)<br />

Gestation at delivery (weeks)<br />

Duration of labor (hours and minutes)<br />

First stage<br />

Second stage<br />

No.<br />

two CS, forty women (8 %) underwent a voluntary<br />

trial of labor after obtaining informed consent. The<br />

characteristics of this cohort of women are presented<br />

in Table 1.<br />

All women were Saudi except one who was a<br />

Pakistani. 40% out of these were > 35 years and parity<br />

ranged from 2 to 9, were short statured (< 150 cm), half<br />

of them had CS in their first pregnancy (primary CS)<br />

and 25% had a repeat CS in their second pregnancy.<br />

More than two third (80%) had a history of vaginal<br />

delivery and 40% had had intervening vaginal delivery<br />

(vaginal delivery between the 2 CS). Thirty eight<br />

women (95%) went into labor spontaneously at a mean<br />

gestational age of 37 + 4.0 weeks (range 26 - 42 weeks)<br />

and labor was induced in two women who had midtrimester<br />

intrauterine fetal deaths with prostaglandin<br />

intravenous (IV) Nalador infusion. Forty-fivepercentof<br />

the women needed labor augmentation by syntocinon<br />

infusion and epidural analgesia. Thirty-four (85%)<br />

of the laboring women had spontaneous vaginal<br />

deliveries and the remaining were assisted breech.<br />

Regarding mean duration of labor, the first stage was<br />

6.1 + 4.01 hrs (range 1.15 - 19.21) and the second stage<br />

was 0.15 + 0.12 hrs (range 0.03 - 0.47).<br />

39<br />

1<br />

24<br />

16<br />

12<br />

28<br />

20<br />

10<br />

32<br />

16<br />

38<br />

9<br />

18<br />

7<br />

30<br />

3<br />

34<br />

6<br />

Mean ± SD<br />

33.6 ± 4.26<br />

4.6 ± 1.95<br />

151.9 ± 5.34<br />

37 ± 4.0<br />

6.1 ± 4.01<br />

0.15 ± 0.12<br />

%<br />

97.5<br />

2.5<br />

60<br />

40<br />

30<br />

70<br />

50<br />

25<br />

80<br />

40<br />

95<br />

22.5<br />

45<br />

17.5<br />

75<br />

7.5<br />

85<br />

15<br />

Range<br />

24 - 42<br />

2 - 9<br />

140 - 165<br />

26 - 42<br />

1.15 - 19.21<br />

0.03 - 0.47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!