08.11.2014 Views

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1 Band Structure Theory 7<br />

respecting the crystal symmetry (B is a Bravais vector and s a vector of the basis<br />

pointing to a Wyckoff position). Thereby the problem is confined to a primitive unit<br />

cell with periodic boundary conditions because the Hamiltonian commutes with the<br />

translation operators of the lattice. Furthermore the amount of unique sites is reduced<br />

by point symmetry. Whether the Bloch Ansatz is a result of the self-consistency cycle<br />

or used <strong>for</strong> the definition of the basis set depends on the chosen scheme (cf. 2.1.3),<br />

nevertheless its appearance in the self-consistent eigenstates arises from the translational<br />

symmetry of the crystal.<br />

2.1.2 Exchange-correlation Functionals<br />

Since there is no general scheme to obtain a universal functional E xc which achieves<br />

highly-accurate results <strong>for</strong> all input configurations it is necessary to choose a wellbalanced<br />

approximation. In principle, the exchange-correlation functional can be expressed<br />

as<br />

E xc [ρ] = 1 2<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

d 3 r 1 ρ (r 1 )<br />

d 3 r 2<br />

1<br />

|r 1 − r 2 | ɛ xc [ρ, ∇ρ, . . .] (r 1 , r 2 )<br />

where the exchange-correlation density ɛ xc depends on both spatial coordinates. Most<br />

functionals used correspond to one of these three classes [17, p. 479–481]:<br />

(a) Local Density Approximation (LDA) type functionals are most widely-used<br />

since they are simple, fast and yield good results <strong>for</strong> systems whose electrons are<br />

itinerant.<br />

The exchange correlation density (whose expectation value is the exchange<br />

correlation energy) depends only on the density at the same spatial position<br />

as the density evaluated <strong>for</strong> the expectation value. Thus it is a local correction.<br />

(b) Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA) are based on the LDA with<br />

higher expansion terms (∇ρ . . .), there<strong>for</strong>e in general the lattice constants and total<br />

energy are typically better than obtained by LDA [? ]. But in general it is not possible<br />

to decide whether LDA or GGA is more sufficient because by the construction<br />

principle the absolute value of the remainder depends on the compound [18, 19].<br />

(c) Hybrid Functionals are constructed by empirical fits between HF (exact exchange),<br />

exchange as well as correlation energies of LDA and GGA [20]. Due to the<br />

portion of exact exchange the description of band gaps in semiconductors is better<br />

than in LDA/GGA but the computational ef<strong>for</strong>t exceeds that of the others.<br />

For all calculations presented in this diploma thesis an LDA-type (spin-dependent: LSDA)<br />

functional [21] was used although it has been proven to be not accurate <strong>for</strong> rather localized<br />

electrons (d or f electrons). The main drawback is, that the assumption of a<br />

slowly-varying charge density is not fulfilled anymore.<br />

If one would try to calculate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!