08.11.2014 Views

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 4 EuRh 2 Si 2 – semi-localized electrons<br />

Figure 4.22: dispersion in X − Γ direction <strong>for</strong> different chosen k z . For k z = [0.0 − 0.285] · π/a x ,<br />

there exists a band gap at Γ which closes at k z = 0.285 · π/a x being exactly the k-point where<br />

a three-fold degenerate eigenenergy value near the Fermi level occurs in the Γ − Z dispersion<br />

(cf. fig. 4.3). When the bands cross, a “Dirac Cone” seems to emerge. Going further to Z, the<br />

band gap vanishes.<br />

occurs at the surface. Similar states have been observed also in ironpnictides the groundstate<br />

of which is metallic, hence it is an ongoing discussion whether the argumentation<br />

made <strong>for</strong> insulators is transferable to intermetallics [80–82]. Many experimentally-based<br />

publications claim, that there is a connection between the Dirac-like dispersion (microscopic<br />

property) and transport (macroscopic property). The major difficulty in their<br />

argumentations is the lacking knowledge of competing effects (e.g. impurity scattering,<br />

magnetic order, correlation between different electronic subsystems) of such complex<br />

systems. There<strong>for</strong>e a short reasoning is given here, why it is worth to investigate the<br />

origin of the linear dispersive state around Γ further and what investigations could be<br />

done.<br />

In fig. 4.21 the dispersion of the linear surface states <strong>for</strong> several cuts parallel to<br />

k x are shown. It emphasizes a fourth-fold symmetry and there are evidences from<br />

observed projected Fermi surfaces (not shown), that the quasi-Dirac cone is rather<br />

de<strong>for</strong>med and that a section of the dispersion in the k x × k y plane can be regarded as a<br />

superposition of two ellipsoids. The Fermi velocity amounts to (3.0±1.0) eV Å≈ 10 −3 ·c<br />

[(2.5 ± 1.0) eV Å≈ 10 −3 · c] (c being the speed of light) <strong>for</strong> Si [Eu] termination which<br />

is three times smaller than in graphene [83]. In the latter transport is dominated by<br />

the Dirac cone but <strong>for</strong> intermetallics, since there are several bands intersecting the<br />

Fermi level, it is not obvious and deserves a careful study.<br />

As it has been demonstrated be<strong>for</strong>e (cf. ch. 4.1.4), the quasi-linear states seem to<br />

be of surface origin. To explain their possible evolution, the bulk band structure is regarded<br />

again. It reveals a three-fold degenerate eigenenergy value in going from Γ to Z<br />

(cf. fig. 4.3) near the Fermi level, which evidences a rather steep slope in the Γ − M direction<br />

(in bulk <strong>for</strong> example: Z−Γ 3 ). To examine this part further, different paths parallel<br />

to the k x × k y plane are depicted in fig. 4.22 demonstrating the k z dispersion. For<br />

k z = [0.0 − 0.285] · π/a x , there exists a band gap at Γ which closes at k z = 0.285 · π/a x .<br />

Arriving at that plane, the degeneracy seems to <strong>for</strong>ce a linear dispersive behaviour<br />

in the vicinity of k 1 = (0, 0, 0.285) · π/a x . Since the projected band structure <strong>for</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!