08.11.2014 Views

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 Hybridization: localized versus itinerant states 49<br />

justifies the choice of the basis set. Due to this simplification, the matrix representation<br />

can be directly written as:<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

ɛ 1 0 . . . V 11 . . . V Nf 1<br />

. 0 .. . . .. .<br />

. ɛ Nd V 1Nd . . . V Nf N d<br />

V 11 . . . V 1Nd ˜ɛ 1 C 12 . . . C 1Nf<br />

(4.4)<br />

. . C .. . .. ⎜ . .. 21 .<br />

.<br />

.<br />

⎝<br />

. .. . .. ⎟<br />

CNf −1N f<br />

⎠<br />

V Nf 1 . . . V Nf N d<br />

C Nf 1 . . . C Nf N f −1 ˜ɛ Nf<br />

This matrix is k-dependent and so the solution yields a rearrangement of the eigenenergies<br />

<strong>for</strong> each k-point corresponding to the hybridization matrix elements V ij , which<br />

are chosen proportional to the overlap of the hybridizing states. The number of valence<br />

states N d corresponds to the number of eigenenergie values in the respective energy<br />

range of the band structure calculation (itinerant electron system). In contrast to that,<br />

the number of localized levels N f and their mixing C ij depends on the interaction of<br />

different levels in photoemission, or more precise, on their origin. As mentioned be<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the m J -degeneracy can be lifted by an electro-magnetic field whereat the field strength<br />

is proportional to the splitting (cf. ch. 4.1.4). The different symmetry considerations<br />

shall be illustrated exemplarily by the atomic PE spectra of Yb and Eu.<br />

Ytterbium [68–71] exhibits as well as europium [49, 67, 72, 73] a complex PE multiplet<br />

structure which has been extensively studied. Since Rare-Earth elements are metals,<br />

they act mainly as electron donors in compounds. This charge redistribution with<br />

respect to the simple superposition of free atoms’ charges causes an increasing electric<br />

field due to the charge separation which lifts the m J -degeneracy. This is known as<br />

crystal electric field splitting. In EuRh 2 Si 2 , this effect cannot be resolved because the<br />

intensity of 4f emission at the Fermi level is rather weak. Additionally, the resolution<br />

gets worse with increasing binding energy due to finite lifetime effects of final states in<br />

photoemission. On the contrary, in YbRh 2 Si 2 the 4f 7/2 multiplet component is located<br />

in the range of the Fermi level and exhibits a resolvable splitting into four different<br />

levels [74]. Since these are mixed representations which lift the 4f shell degeneracy,<br />

they are partially coupled to each other and accordingly the model should respect their<br />

symmetry. In this case N f equals four having two representation ( Γ i t6 and Γi t7 ) with<br />

two elements each. To adopt the symmetry relations, each representation is coupled<br />

only once to the VB and a repulsive “<strong>for</strong>ce” is added between elements of the same<br />

representation because they are <strong>for</strong>bidden to be degenerate (Pauli principle). This<br />

has already been presented by Vyalikh et. al. [68] (thereafter called model 1 “coupled<br />

localized levels”). Contrariwise, the coupling between states with different J is negligible<br />

and thus a superposition of the hybridized spectra of each final state configuration with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!