08.11.2014 Views

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

Diploma - Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 3 Experimental foundations<br />

mean free inelastic scattering path of electrons in solids follows a general curve<br />

(cf. fig. 2.3) yields <strong>for</strong> the used energy range [45. . .140] eV approximately [4. . .8] Å,<br />

thus PE is rather surface sensitive. Hence, to obtain clean surfaces with few adsorbed<br />

atoms / molecules, we prepare them in-situ by cleaving (a stick which<br />

has been glued previously onto the sample is used as lever to split the sample,<br />

see fig. 3.1). The difference between surface and bulk states can experimentally<br />

be distinguished by choosing different surfaces or by quenching of surface emission<br />

involving the deposition of adlayers. In ab-initio calculations, one can use<br />

the contribution of the first layer to the band structure of a supercell (slab) as<br />

an estimate, where the translational invariance is broken parallel to the surface<br />

normal. Nevertheless, also the top layer contributes to bulk states, and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

one should generally use the states, the charge density of which is localized<br />

at the surface. As the DFT calculations deal solely with itinerant electrons, the<br />

PE of rather localized 4f electrons has to be incooperated in another way. The<br />

insignificant overlap in all three spatial dimensions of the respective states allows<br />

to use calculated atomic PE spectra as a first approximation. The 4f emission<br />

of Eu adlayers is shifted towards higher binding energies due to the asymmetry<br />

in the potential at the surface. Since the lower coordination number effects<br />

the distribution of valence electrons, the binding energy of europiums’ 4f orbitals<br />

changes and there<strong>for</strong>e the shift of the surface emission is comparable to that of a<br />

surface core level shift (predictable by a Born-Haber process [33]).<br />

• As a coarse approximation atomic cross sections <strong>for</strong> photoemission will be used<br />

to analyze the corresponding spectra. Basically it has been shown, that they are<br />

different in solids (e.g. revealing several Fano resonances [34]) caused by deviations<br />

in the shape of the wave function, particularly due to different boundary conditions<br />

in the solid and the free atom. However, the calculation is non-trivial and in zeroth<br />

order the atomic cross sections are a suitable estimate.<br />

3.2 General setup<br />

The photoemission spectra were taken at two experimental setups located at different<br />

synchrotron sources each having its unique beamline layout and endstation characteristic.<br />

Their specifics will be discussed below.<br />

Generally, a synchroton radiation source consists of a booster unit composed of diverting<br />

coils and accelerating parts, which take charged particles to high energies (typically<br />

several GeV). The variation of the magnetic field according to the particles’ speed keeps<br />

them on a closed orbit. Afterwards they are induced into a storage ring where the energy<br />

loss (proportional to the amount of synchrotron radiation) is compensated by linear accelerators<br />

mounted into the ring so the particles remain at an orbit with constant speed.<br />

Since the radiation at high energies peaks strongly in the <strong>for</strong>ward direction in contrast

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!