Master's Thesis - Studierstube Augmented Reality Project - Graz ...

LIST OF FIGURES
5.10 Influence of the µ and σ values on a volumetric slice rendering node with
Gauss distributed transparency values. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
5.11 The texture management of a particle effect with predefined 3D flow
texture in principle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
5.12 Indicating the generated time of a path line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
5.13 The stream tubes visualization algorithm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
6.1 The measurement setup at the radiology department of the Landesklinikum
Graz for a flow phantom with artificial narrowing. . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
6.2 Point based glyph overview of the human heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
6.3 Particle based sparse representation of the artificial stenosis dataset . . 118
6.4 Comparing illuminated stream lines and path lines. . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
6.5 Comparing different cutting plane visualizations for the same dataset-
Comparing different cutting plane visualizations for the same dataset. . 120
6.6 Stream tubes applied to calculated stream lines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
6.7 Two examples for a concurrent combination of different visualizations. . 121
6.8 Comparing the frame rates of glyphs rendered at every fifth position
with GPU visualizations at a buffer size of 1024x1024. . . . . . . . . . . 122
6.9 Comparing the frame rates of glyphs rendered at every fifth position with
GPU visualizations at a buffer size of 1024x1024 and SimVoleon nodes. 122
6.10 Comparing the frame rates of glyphs rendered at every tenth position
with GPU visualizations at a buffer size of 512x512. . . . . . . . . . . . 123
6.11 Comparing the frame rates of glyphs rendered at every fifth position
with GPU visualizations at a buffer size of 256x256. . . . . . . . . . . . 123
6.12 Comparing the average frame rates from particles, illuminated stream
lines and path lines and stream tubes at a buffer size of 512x512. . . . . 124
7.1 The investigated areas of the in chapter 2 presented taxonomy are shown
on the left. The remaining parts for future work are shown on the right
side. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
7.2 Studierstube setup. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
B.1 A dataset for flow data and its interfaces and inheritances as part of an
UML class diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
B.2 UML class diagram for Viewer classes with special interest in flow scriptingand
Cash-flow Views. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
B.3 An thinned out UML class diagram showing the underlying widgets of
the Color gradient editor dialog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
B.4 The left side of figure B.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
B.5 This UML class diagram gives an overview of the additional implemented
visualization nodes. The left part of this diagram is given in figure B.4. 145
154