19.11.2014 Views

Teaching Earth Sciences - Earth Science Teachers' Association

Teaching Earth Sciences - Earth Science Teachers' Association

Teaching Earth Sciences - Earth Science Teachers' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Peneplains and plate tectonics<br />

Mark Hayward<br />

Abstract<br />

Regional-scale erosion surfaces known as peneplains<br />

preoccupied geomorphologists for about sixty years of<br />

the twentieth century. By the time the theory of plate<br />

tectonics had become embedded in the <strong>Earth</strong> sciences,<br />

the peneplain concept had virtually disappeared<br />

from view. Recent research, however, indicates that<br />

the concept, albeit in a revised form, could have an<br />

important role to play in understanding landforms on<br />

a large scale in the context of plate tectonics.<br />

Introduction<br />

It is surprising that two recent physical geography texts<br />

(Holden, 2008 and McKnight & Hess, 2008) devote no<br />

space to landforms at the regional scale. The latter, an<br />

American text, includes a map of world landform regions,<br />

but states that the pattern is random and will not be<br />

considered any further! The other text, a widely used<br />

British one at undergraduate level, covers plate tectonics<br />

briefly. The explanation of regional-scale surface features<br />

is an important aspect of geomorphology that has been<br />

quite neglected. The theory of plate tectonics provides a<br />

framework to explain the distribution of landform regions.<br />

The peneplain concept provided geomorphologists with<br />

a phenomenon that can be mapped and correlated from<br />

place to place at a regional scale (morphostratigraphy).<br />

The quantitative revolution in geography from the<br />

1960s onwards led to an emphasis on smaller-scale<br />

process studies. This was a paradigm shift away from the<br />

dominance of Davisian denudation chronology, which<br />

underpinned the peneplain concept. Meanwhile, a better<br />

understanding of tectonics undermined the eustatic<br />

view of world-wide changes in base level that many<br />

geomorphologists believed in.<br />

It is not intended to argue for a return to W M Davis’s cycle<br />

of youth-maturity-old age that dominated geomorphology<br />

for half a century towards the end of the last millennium.<br />

This article will focus on one of his important concepts,<br />

the peneplain, and summarise some recent research by<br />

<strong>Earth</strong> scientists, while setting it alongside arguably its<br />

stratigraphic counterpart, the unconformity. Google<br />

Scholar was used to search for relevant recent research,<br />

using the keywords peneplain, planation surface and<br />

unconformity. Most ‘hits’ were in the form of abstracts,<br />

but several were pdf files. Unless otherwise stated, the<br />

term peneplain will be used in a broad sense, following<br />

Fairbridge & Finkl (1980): ‘a polygenetic surface of low<br />

relief’: in other words, an extensive lowland formed by<br />

weathering and erosion.<br />

Do peneplains exist?<br />

Peneplains were once fundamental to geomorphological<br />

analysis (Figure 1). Phillips (2002) however, states that<br />

‘despite more than a century of effort, no convincing<br />

example of a contemporary peneplain has been identified,<br />

and the identification of relict peneplains is uncertain and<br />

controversial’. He sets out to demonstrate mathematically<br />

that the relationship between erosion and deposition rates<br />

and uplift or erosion are ‘dynamically unstable’. Therefore,<br />

tectonic stability alone is insufficient to account for the<br />

lack of peneplains, and must be considered together with,<br />

for example, changes in sea level, climate and isostatic<br />

changes.<br />

Nevertheless, whether considering large-scale surface<br />

features of the <strong>Earth</strong>, or extensive unconformities in the<br />

geological record, evidence of widespread erosion surfaces,<br />

or planation surfaces (therefore peneplains in Fairbridge’s<br />

sense) is incontrovertible.<br />

Examples of peneplains in recent research<br />

Coltori et al (2007) write that ‘Planation surfaces are<br />

an old-fashioned topic in geomorphology, but they are<br />

nevertheless important where they make up much of<br />

the landscape’. Furthermore, ‘These surfaces indicate<br />

that eastern Africa underwent long episodes of tectonic<br />

quiescence during which erosion processes were able<br />

to planate the surface at altitudes not too far from sea<br />

level’; in other words they are peneplains in the Davisian<br />

sense. Successive planation leads to stepped topography.<br />

Peulvast & Claudino Sales (2004) have re-evaluated<br />

stepped planation surfaces in North East Brazil, relating<br />

them to continental rifting and Atlantic opening in the<br />

Cretaceous. Campbell et al (2006) document the Neogene<br />

www.esta-uk.net Vol 35 No 1 2010 <strong>Teaching</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> <strong><strong>Science</strong>s</strong> 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!