23.11.2014 Views

Full Release - IRmep

Full Release - IRmep

Full Release - IRmep

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

·The Jewisli Journal OfGreater Los Angeles<br />

o<br />

Ciralsky refused to comment.<br />

o<br />

Page 4 of5<br />

FBI officials repeatedly refused to discuss the Franklin stings. The bureau<br />

also refused to respond to questions about whether members of the media<br />

- including those at CBS, NBC and even this reporter - are under<br />

surveillance as part of their investigation. But at one point, a senior FBI<br />

official with knowledge of the case finally stated, "I cannot confirm or deny<br />

that Information [due to] the pending investigation."<br />

Some Washington insiders believe that the FBI's multiple stings are far<br />

from routine counterintelligence but represent a "war" between the<br />

counterintelligence community and policymakers, especially neocons.<br />

One key insider explained the war this way.: "It ,is two diametrically<br />

opposed ways of thinking. The neocons have an interventionist mindset<br />

willing to ally with anyone to defeat world terrorism, and they see the<br />

intelligence community as too passive. The intelligence community sees<br />

the neocons as wild men Willing to champion any foreign source - no<br />

,matter how specious - if it suits their ideology." .<br />

Leading neoconservative figure Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise.<br />

Institute added ~is own thought.<br />

"This is a war of the intelligence community vs. the neoconservatives,"<br />

Rubin observed. "It involves both the right and the left of the· intelligence<br />

community. It is a war about policy, the point being, the CIA must not be<br />

involved in policy. The CIA's role is to provide intelligence. and let the<br />

policymakers decide what to do with it, and it appears they are not sticking<br />

to that role - and that is a dangerous situation."<br />

"This is the politicizing of intelligence," he continued. "But the CIA, by its<br />

establishing principle.s, is not to be involved in politics."<br />

Rubin added that the sting effort "against AIPAC is the culmination of a 20-<br />

year witch-hunt from a small corps within the counterintellige'nce •<br />

community" that Rubin labeled "conspiracy theorists." He added, "What is<br />

the common denominator between the Ciralsky case and the AIPAC case?<br />

David Szady.,"<br />

.Szady, who has been decorated twice by the CIA for distinguished service,<br />

answered one critic, writing, "I am not at liberty to comment on pe~ding<br />

investigations." Szady had issued a statement to this reporter earlier that<br />

he "has no anti-Semitic views, has never handled a case or investigation<br />

based upon an individual's ethnicity or religious views and would·never do<br />

so."<br />

One neoconservative at the center of the counterintelligence war said:<br />

"This is just the beginning. Nobody knows where this war is going."<br />

Edwin Black is the authorof "IBM and the Holocaust" (Crown, 2001).<br />

Black's current best seller is "Banking on Baghdad" (Wiley), which<br />

chronicles 7,000 years ofIraqi history. This article first appeared in the.<br />

Forward.<br />

Let's talk about it... CS><br />

http://www.jewishjoumal.com/home/preview.php?id=13528 111412005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!