23.11.2014 Views

Full Release - IRmep

Full Release - IRmep

Full Release - IRmep

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

t'<br />

'n ~.<br />

I~aq. The foreign diplomats~o received classified information in the alleged scheme<br />

~<br />

Ii a~;>pear to have been Israelis.<br />

In court papers asking that the charges be dismissed, the defense lawyers argue that the<br />

prosecution is attempting to criminalize the traditional give and take of information<br />

b-etween lobbyists, journalists, and government, officials. "This is what. members ot the<br />

media, members of the Washington policy community, lobbyists ~nd members of congressional<br />

staffs do perhaps hundreds of times every day, II the lawyers wrote. liThe exchange of<br />

informa~ion between members of, the government and non-governmental organizations is<br />

p,recisely what policy lobbying (as well as everyday news reporting) is all about. II<br />

The prosecution's response to the motion·was filed late last. month, but. has not yet been<br />

made public. In an unusual arrangement, mos~ papers filed in the case remain secret for a<br />

time while they are reviewed for classified information.<br />

In an interview yesterday, Mr. Weissman's attorney, John Nassikas III, said the<br />

p,rosecution should be of concern to all those who play a role in Washington policy<br />

debates. IIHopefully, there will be some resonance out, in the community over this," the<br />

l,awyer said. "We think that the government prosecution is off-base and we're challenging<br />

in every way, legally and factual·ly. II<br />

H,owever, Mr. Nassikas acknowledged that the defense may face an uphill battle in trying to<br />

c,onvince Judge Thomas Ellis III, who is presiding over the case, that the prosecution<br />

would jnhibit the free exchange of ideas and information vital to American democracy. At<br />

Frank~in's sentencing last month, the jUdge expressed no qualms abou~ punishing<br />

j,ournali:5ts or others who wind up with classified information and pass it. on. IIPersons who<br />

~ave ,unauthorized possession, who come into unauthorized possession of classified<br />

information, must abide by the law," Judge Ellis said in remarks first reported by the<br />

~ewish Telegraphi~Agency. ,iThat applies to academics, lawyers, journalists, professors,<br />

whatever. II<br />

. .<br />

The brief filed on behalf of Messrs. Rosen and Weissman was co-authored by a conservative<br />

Georgetown University law professor and for:mer Justice Department official, Viet Dinh. 'Mr.<br />

Dinh's opposition t~ th~ department's stance in this case is notable because he has #<br />

generally supported aggressive prosecution tactics and was an architect of the 2001 law<br />

that broadened the government's anti-terrorism powers, the USA-PATRIOT Act.<br />

"He's obviously an ~xpert on constitutional law issues, and there have been a-lot of<br />

constitutional law flaws in the government's application of this statute," Mr. Nassikas<br />

said. He said Mr. Dinh was enlisted by Mr. Rose~'s attorney, Abbe Lowell. Messrs. Lowell<br />

and Dinh did not ~eturn calls yesterday seeking comment for this story.<br />

The case has drawn criticism from some Jewish activists as well as a journalists' group,<br />

the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the"Press, which has sought to file an amicus brief<br />

on behalf of the two eX-lobbyists.<br />

Legal analysts often distinguish the American .lega~ system's approach toward breaches.of<br />

classified information fro~ t~e tack taken in Britain, where the country's Official<br />

Secrets Act can be used to prosecute and silence journalists and ordinary citizens who<br />

come into possession of sensitive infor:mation. In America, the~e have 'been repeated, but<br />

unsuccessful, efforts to pass a similar statute that would crimdnalize all leaks of<br />

classified information regardless of the harm caused or the intent or identity of the<br />

leaker.<br />

In 2000, President Clinton vetoed ~egislation that would have made the release ot any<br />

classified information a crime.<br />

lilt would be fundamentally unfair for the Justice Department to usurp the province of<br />

Co~gress and create some type of Official Secrets Act through the prosecution of a test<br />

case," the defense team argued in their brief.<br />

The brief also quotes a prominent federal prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, about the perils<br />

of bringing criminal charges in connection with leaks' o~ classified information. "You<br />

sho~ld be ver.y careful in applying that law because there are a lot. ·of interests that<br />

c,ould '.be imp~i.cated," Mr. Fitzgerald said at a press conference last. year discussing his<br />

2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!