Weed Control Methods Handbook: Tools ... - Invasive.org
Weed Control Methods Handbook: Tools ... - Invasive.org
Weed Control Methods Handbook: Tools ... - Invasive.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Biological <strong>Control</strong> 4.20<br />
340 In E.S. Delfosse (ed.) Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on the<br />
Biological <strong>Control</strong> of <strong>Weed</strong>s, 19-25 August 1984, Vancouver, Canada. Agriculture<br />
Canada.<br />
DeLoach, C.J. 1991. Past Successes and current prospects in biological control of weeds<br />
in the United States and Canada. Natural Areas Journal 11:129-142..<br />
Diehl, J. and P.B. McEvoy. 1990. Impact of the cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaea) on Senecio<br />
triangularis, a nontarget native plant in Oregon. Pp. 119-126. In E.S. Delfosse (ed.)<br />
Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological <strong>Control</strong> of <strong>Weed</strong>s, 6-11 March<br />
1988. Ministerio dell’ Agricolturae delle Foreste, Rome, and CSIRO, Melbourne.<br />
Ehler, L.E. 1998. Conservation biological control: past, present and future. Pp. 1-8. In P. Barbosa<br />
(ed.) Conservation biological control. Academic Press, San Diego.<br />
Goeden, R.D. and D.W. Ricker. 1981. Santa Cruz Island - revisited. Sequential<br />
photography records the causation, rates of progress, and lasting benefits of<br />
successful biological weed control. pp. 355-365 In E.S. Delfosse (ed.) Proceedings<br />
of the V International Symposium on the Biocontrol of <strong>Weed</strong>s. July 22-27 1980,<br />
Brisbane, Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne.<br />
Greathead, D.J. 1995. Benefits and risks of classical biocontrol. Pp 53-63 In H.M.<br />
Hokkanen and J.M. Lynch (eds.) Biological control: benefits and risks. Cambridge<br />
University Press, Cambridge, U.K.<br />
Haag, K.H. and D.H. Habeck. 1991. Enhanced biological control of waterhyacinth<br />
following limited herbicide application. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 29:<br />
55-57.<br />
Habeck, D.H. Professor, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, personal<br />
communication to J.M. Randall, October, 1994.<br />
Habeck, D.H. and F.D. Bennett. 1990. Cactoblastis cactorum Berg (Lepidoptera:<br />
Pyralidae) a Phycitine new to Florida. Entomology Circular N. 333, August 1990,<br />
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant<br />
Industry, Tallahassee<br />
Harris, P. 1988. Environmental impact of weed-control insects. BioScience 38: 542-<br />
548.<br />
Hokannen, H. and D. Pimentel. 1984. New approach for selecting biological control<br />
agents. Canadian Entomologist 116:1109-1121.<br />
Hokannen, H. and D. Pimentel. 1989. New associations in biological control: theory and<br />
practice. Canadian Entomologist 121:829-840<br />
Holloway, J.K. and C.B. Huffaker. 1951. The role of Chrysolina gemellata in the<br />
biological control of Klamath weed. Journal of Economic Entomology 44:244-247.<br />
Huffaker, C.B. and C.E. Kennett. 1959. a ten-year study of vegetational changes<br />
associated with biological control of Klamath weed. Journal of Range Management<br />
12:69-82.<br />
Johnson, D.M. 1994. M.S. thesis, University of Central Florida.<br />
Julien, M.H. (ed.). 1992. Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and<br />
their target weeds, 3 rd edition. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Wallingford,<br />
United Kingdom.<br />
Julien,M.H. and G.W. Griffiths (eds.) 1998. Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of<br />
agents and their target weeds. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, United<br />
Kingdom. 240 pp.<br />
<strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>Methods</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong>, The Nature Conservancy, Tu et al.
Change language