25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong><br />

waterbody in the assessment unit has been assessed, and other waters in the<br />

watershed may not be impaired.<br />

Since the October 2003 update <strong>of</strong> the 303(d) list, further data became<br />

available for assessment <strong>of</strong> the basin, and these data were used to update<br />

the listing status <strong>of</strong> waters. Table F.1 in Appendix F contains the listing<br />

status <strong>of</strong> all assessed waters in the basin as <strong>of</strong> May 2004. An order containing<br />

the initial Verified List <strong>of</strong> Impaired Group 2 Waters (Verified List) was<br />

signed by the <strong>Department</strong>’s Secretary on May 27, 2004. The order was<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficially noticed in the May 28, 2004, edition <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Florida</strong> Administrative<br />

Weekly, which started a 21-day period to file a petition challenging the<br />

order and a 30-day period to appeal the order.<br />

Pollutant Causing Impairments<br />

Of the 427 water segments in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin, 58 waters<br />

are verified as being impaired for at least 1 parameter, and a TMDL is<br />

required for each <strong>of</strong> these waters. A total <strong>of</strong> 88 TMDLs are required for<br />

these waters following the methodology in Appendix E. The Lake Jesup<br />

planning unit has the largest number <strong>of</strong> TMDL requirements, being<br />

identified as 22, followed by the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River<br />

planning units with 18 TMDLs. At this stage, no TMDL requirement has<br />

been identified for the Alexander Spring Creek.<br />

Table 4.3 lists the number <strong>of</strong> TMDLs required for each planning unit<br />

and the parameters under concern.<br />

Table 4.4 lists the number <strong>of</strong> impairments for each parameter under<br />

concern in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River Basin. Ten pollutant parameters<br />

are identified in the basin. The most common parameter exhibiting<br />

impairment throughout the basin is the nutrient. In 7 <strong>of</strong> the 9 planning<br />

Table 4.3: Number <strong>of</strong> TMDLs Required for Each Planning Unit<br />

Planning Units<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

TMDLs<br />

Required<br />

Parameters under Concern<br />

Lake Jesup 22 Nutrients, unionized ammonia,<br />

DO, iron, fecal coliforms, and<br />

total coliforms<br />

Wekiva River 18 Nutrients, DO, BOD fecal<br />

coliforms, total coliforms, and<br />

mercury in fish<br />

Econlockhatchee River 18 Nutrients, DO, BOD, fecal coliforms,<br />

total coliforms, and iron<br />

Lake Monroe 12 Nutrients, DO, fecal coliforms,<br />

and iron<br />

Deep Creek 9 Nutrients, DO, iron, lead, and<br />

mercury in fish<br />

Lake George 7 Nutrients, DO, and mercury in<br />

fish<br />

Lake Kerr 1 Mercury in fish<br />

Lake Woodruff 1 Nutrients<br />

Alexander Springs Creek 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!