25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong><br />

EVALUATION OF TOXICITY DATA<br />

Although the Impaired Surface Waters Rule describes the use <strong>of</strong> toxicity data for the<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> aquatic life-based attainment, no ambient toxicity data are available for<br />

assessment and this metric was not used.<br />

Primary Contact and Recreation Attainment<br />

For Class I, II, or III waters, a waterbody was potentially impaired if the following<br />

criteria were met:<br />

• The waterbody segment did not meet the applicable water quality criteria for<br />

bacteriological quality,<br />

• The waterbody segment included a bathing area that was closed by a local health<br />

department or county government for more than one week or more than once during<br />

a calendar year based on bacteriological data,<br />

• The waterbody segment included a bathing area for which a local health department<br />

or county government issued closures, advisories, or warnings totaling twenty-one<br />

days or more during a calendar year based on bacteriological data,<br />

• The waterbody segment included a bathing area that was closed or had advisories or<br />

warnings for more than twelve weeks during a calendar year based on previous<br />

bacteriological data or on derived relationships between bacteria levels and rainfall<br />

or flow.<br />

Fish and Shellfish Consumption Attainment<br />

For Class I, II, or III waters, a waterbody was potentially impaired if it did not meet<br />

the applicable Class II water quality criteria for bacteriological quality, or if a fish<br />

consumption advisory had been issued. Fish consumption advisories were based on the<br />

<strong>Florida</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Health’s “limited consumption” or “no consumption” advisories<br />

for surface waters because <strong>of</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> mercury in fish tissue. In addition, for Class<br />

II waters, waterbody segments that had been approved for shellfish harvesting but were<br />

downgraded to a more restrictive classification were listed as potentially impaired.<br />

Drinking Water Attainment and <strong>Protection</strong> <strong>of</strong> Human Health<br />

For Class I waters, a waterbody was potentially impaired if it did not meet the<br />

applicable Class I water quality criteria.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!