25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong><br />

description <strong>of</strong> each planning unit, information on land use and potential<br />

point sources <strong>of</strong> pollution, water quality assessments for individual waterbody<br />

segments, and summaries <strong>of</strong> ecological issues and watershed quality<br />

improvement plans and projects.<br />

Appendix F <strong>of</strong> this report provides the integrated assessment<br />

summary, a list <strong>of</strong> water quality monitoring stations, and trend data.<br />

Appendix G includes summary information, by planning unit, for permitted<br />

wastewater treatment facilities, Superfund sites, and permitted landfill<br />

facilities in the basin. Appendix H lists Level I land uses by planning unit.<br />

Appendix I contains maps showing integration by parameter group for the<br />

<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin as a whole.<br />

Information on<br />

Point Sources<br />

in Planning<br />

Units<br />

Point sources discharging<br />

pollutants to surface water<br />

or ground water originate<br />

from discrete, well-defined<br />

areas such as a facility<br />

discharge from the end <strong>of</strong><br />

a pipe, a disposal well, or a<br />

wastewater sprayfield. Point<br />

sources generally fall into<br />

two major types: domestic<br />

wastewater sources (which<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> sewage from<br />

homes, businesses, and<br />

institutions) and industrial<br />

wastewater sources (which<br />

include wastewater, run<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

and leachate from industrial<br />

or commercial storage,<br />

handling, or processing<br />

facilities). Landfills, hazardous<br />

waste sites, dry cleaning<br />

solvent cleanup program<br />

(DSCP) sites, and petroleum<br />

facility discharges are also<br />

considered point sources.<br />

These sites have the potential<br />

to leach contaminants into<br />

ground water and surface<br />

water.<br />

Identifying the source <strong>of</strong><br />

waterbody impairment is an<br />

important part <strong>of</strong> assessing<br />

water quality and developing<br />

TMDLs. As part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

report, information is presented<br />

on point sources,<br />

including permitted facilities<br />

that discharge wastewater<br />

and landfills.<br />

Assessment by Planning Unit<br />

• Alexander Springs Creek Planning Unit<br />

General Description<br />

The Alexander Springs Creek planning unit, in the Ocala National<br />

Forest, covers about 63,953 acres (100 square miles) and lies within portions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lake and Marion Counties. Alexander Springs, for which the<br />

planning unit is named, is a first-magnitude spring discharging 94.2 cubic<br />

feet per second as <strong>of</strong> September 2001 (Scott et al., 2002). Alexander<br />

Springs Creek flows east for approximately 8 miles until it meets the<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River just south <strong>of</strong> Lake Dexter (Scott et al., 2002). Other major<br />

waterbodies include Buck Lake (for which the Buck Lake Wildlife Area is<br />

named), Akron Lake, and Sellers Lake.<br />

Water Quality Summary<br />

Figure 3.3, a composite map <strong>of</strong> the planning unit, shows waters on<br />

the 1998 303(d) list, the Planning List and Verified List, and potential<br />

pollution sources. There are 23 water quality monitoring stations used for<br />

analysis (Appendix F). Table 3.5 summarizes the water quality assessment<br />

status <strong>of</strong> all waterbody segments in the planning unit.<br />

Of the 16 waterbody segments in the Alexander Springs Creek planning<br />

unit, 9 have at least some type <strong>of</strong> data in the planning and/or verification<br />

periods, but in many cases, the data are insufficient for assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

segments under the IWR. Five segments have sufficient data for assessment,<br />

and <strong>of</strong> these, none are verified impaired for at least 1 parameter<br />

assessed, 1 remains on the Planning List as only potentially impaired, and<br />

4 meet standards for all parameters assessed.<br />

Buck Lake, the site <strong>of</strong> a national forest campground, is potentially<br />

impaired for fecal and total coliform bacteria and remains on the<br />

Planning List.<br />

Permitted Discharges and Land Uses<br />

Point Sources. There are four permitted point source discharges in<br />

the Alexander Springs Creek planning unit (see sidebar for a definition <strong>of</strong><br />

point sources). All <strong>of</strong> these are domestic wastewater facilities permitted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!