25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong><br />

Water Quality Improvement Plans and Projects<br />

Waters will not be placed on the Verified List if the <strong>Department</strong><br />

receives reasonable assurance that existing or proposed projects and/or programs<br />

are expected to result in the attainment <strong>of</strong> water quality standards or<br />

consistently improve water quality over time. Chapter 4 and Appendix D<br />

contain additional information on the requirements for reasonable<br />

assurance.<br />

For this planning unit, no management plans or projects complying<br />

with the <strong>Department</strong>’s guidance for reasonable assurance have been provided<br />

for the 2002 list <strong>of</strong> impaired waters.<br />

• Deep Creek Planning Unit<br />

General Description<br />

Covering 175,454 acres (274 square miles), the Deep Creek planning<br />

unit lies within portions <strong>of</strong> south Volusia, northwestern Brevard, and<br />

northeastern Seminole Counties. Major waterbodies include Lake Ashby<br />

and Lake Harney. Lake Ashby lies north <strong>of</strong> Lake Harney, and the Lake<br />

Ashby Canal connects the 2 lakes. The Deep Creek and Lake Ashby tributaries<br />

connect to the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River to the south. Volusia County operates<br />

a park on Lake Ashby that includes camping facilities, picnic areas, and a<br />

boardwalk. The planning unit is largely undeveloped (SJRWMD, 2002a).<br />

Water Quality Summary<br />

Figure 3.4, a composite map <strong>of</strong> the planning unit, shows waters on the<br />

1998 303(d) list, the Planning List and Verified List, and potential pollution<br />

sources. Water quality data from 30 monitoring stations were used for<br />

assessment (Appendix F). Table 3.6 summarizes the water quality assessment<br />

status <strong>of</strong> all waterbody segments in the planning unit.<br />

Of the 25 waterbody segments in the Deep Creek planning unit, 14<br />

have at least some type <strong>of</strong> data in the planning and/or verification periods,<br />

but in many cases, the data are insufficient for assessment <strong>of</strong> segments<br />

under the IWR. Eight segments have sufficient data for assessment, and <strong>of</strong><br />

these, 4 are verified impaired for at least 1 parameter assessed, 1 remains on<br />

the Planning List, 1 meets the threshold for impairment for DO but not by<br />

a specific pollutant, and 2 meet standards for all parameters assessed.<br />

Listed below are the verified impaired segments in the planning unit<br />

with the parameters for which they are impaired.<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River Above Lake Jesup DO, nutrients (chlorophyll a)<br />

Deep Creek–Lake Ashby Canal Cadmium, iron, lead, selenium<br />

Lake Winnemissett<br />

Lead<br />

Lake Harney<br />

DO, mercury in fish, nutrients<br />

(trophic state index [TSI])<br />

Other potential impairments in the planning unit include low DO<br />

levels and metals in a couple waterbody segments, coliform bacteria in<br />

Deep Creek–Lake Ashby Canal and mercury in fish tissue as indicated by<br />

fish consumption advisories in the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River above Lake Jesup.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!