25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> 249<br />

EXCEEDANCES OF NUTRIENT THRESHOLDS<br />

The state currently has a narrative nutrient criterion instead <strong>of</strong> a numeric value for<br />

nutrient thresholds. The narrative criterion states, “In no case shall nutrient<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> a body <strong>of</strong> water be altered so as to cause an imbalance in natural<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> aquatic flora or fauna.” The Impaired Surface Waters Rule provides an<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> the narrative nutrient criterion. In general, the Trophic <strong>St</strong>ate Index (TSI)<br />

and the annual mean chlorophyll a values are the primary means for assessing whether a<br />

waterbody should be assessed further for nutrient impairment.<br />

The rule also considers other information that might indicate an imbalance in flora or<br />

fauna due to nutrient enrichment, such as algal blooms, excessive macrophyte growth, a<br />

decrease in the distribution (either in density or aerial coverage) <strong>of</strong> seagrasses or other<br />

submerged aquatic vegetation, changes in algal species richness, and excessive diel<br />

oxygen swings.<br />

Potential nutrient impairment was evaluated by calculating annual mean chlorophyll<br />

a values for estuaries and streams and the TSI for lakes. For lakes, the TSI was<br />

calculated using chlorophyll a, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen measurements. Direct<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> imbalances <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna in waterbodies was also considered in the<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> nutrient impairments.<br />

In estuarine areas, a water was considered nutrient enriched if the annual mean<br />

chlorophyll a values were greater than 11 micrograms per liter (µg/L) or if annual mean<br />

chlorophyll a values increased by more than 50 percent over historical values for at least<br />

two consecutive years. For streams, a water was considered nutrient enriched if the<br />

annual mean chlorophyll a values were greater than 20 µg/L or if the annual mean<br />

increased by more than 50 percent over historical values for at least two consecutive<br />

years.<br />

A lake with a mean color greater than 40 platinum cobalt units (PCUs) was<br />

considered nutrient enriched if the annual mean TSI exceeded 60. A lake with a mean<br />

color less than or equal to 40 PCUs was considered nutrient enriched if the annual mean<br />

TSI exceeded 40. In addition, a lake was considered nutrient enriched if there was an<br />

increase in TSI over the 1989 to 2000 period or if TSI measurements were 10 units higher<br />

than historical values.<br />

EXCEEDANCE SOF BIOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS<br />

Bioassessments were carried out for streams, lakes, canals, and rivers using the<br />

Impaired Surface Waters Rule as guidance and following the <strong>Department</strong>’s standard<br />

operating procedures, which provide definitions and specific methods for the generation<br />

and analysis <strong>of</strong> bioassessment data. These are referenced in the individual bioassessment<br />

data tables contained in the Basin <strong>St</strong>atus Reports. The purpose behind using a<br />

bioassessment methodology in surface water characterizations is that biological<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the environment manifest long-term water quality conditions and thus<br />

provide a better indication <strong>of</strong> a waterbody’s true health than discrete chemical or physical<br />

measurements alone. Similar to water quality criteria, bioassessment methods involve<br />

the identification <strong>of</strong> a biological reference condition, based on data from unimpaired or<br />

least impacted waters in a given region.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!