25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong><br />

Update on <strong>St</strong>rategic Monitoring and Data-<br />

Gathering Activities During Phase 2<br />

During Phase 2 <strong>of</strong> the watershed management cycle, strategic monitoring<br />

and data-gathering activities focused first on waters on the 1998 303(d)<br />

list, followed by waters that were placed on the Planning List through the<br />

IWR assessment alone. The majority <strong>of</strong> the strategic monitoring work<br />

was conducted by the <strong>Florida</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Protection</strong>’s<br />

(<strong>Department</strong>) Central District staff and included both chemical and biological<br />

monitoring and data upload to STOrage and RETrieval (STORET)<br />

databases. Data-gathering activities included working with environmental<br />

monitoring staff in the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River Water Management District<br />

(SJRWMD) and local and county governments to obtain applicable<br />

monitoring data from their routine monitoring programs and special water<br />

quality projects in the basin.<br />

Twenty-three waterbody segments on the Planning List and the 1998<br />

303(d) list needed further data to verify impairment. Parameters included<br />

silver, cadmium, iron, lead and selenium. Also included were biology<br />

(based on bioassessments), biological oxygen demand (BOD), DO, fecal<br />

and total coliforms, unionized ammonia, nutrients and their indicators<br />

(nitrogen, phosphorus, and chlorophyll a), turbidity, and total suspended<br />

solids (TSS).<br />

Fifty-eight waterbody segments were verified impaired for at least<br />

1 parameter in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin as the result <strong>of</strong> strategic monitoring<br />

and data-gathering activities in Phase 2. Table F.1 in Appendix F<br />

provides the updated impairment status <strong>of</strong> the basin through April 2004.<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> Data<br />

The assessment <strong>of</strong> water quality in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin includes<br />

an analysis <strong>of</strong> quantitative data from various sources, some <strong>of</strong> which are<br />

readily available to the public. These sources include the U.S. <strong>Environmental</strong><br />

<strong>Protection</strong> Agency’s (EPA) Legacy and “new” STORET databases,<br />

the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the <strong>Florida</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

(DOH). The STORET databases contain water quality data from a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> sources, including the <strong>Department</strong>, water management districts,<br />

local governments, and volunteer monitoring groups. Appendix E<br />

contains a detailed description <strong>of</strong> STORET and the methodology used to<br />

develop the Planning and Verified Lists, based on the IWR.<br />

Table 3.1 summarizes the individual data providers who contributed<br />

to the IWR 2002 Database for the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin for the period<br />

<strong>of</strong> record used in this assessment. Figure 3.1 shows the contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

each provider by year. Data providers that contributed the largest amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> data for this assessment are SJRWMD (34 percent), Orange County<br />

(22 percent), and <strong>Florida</strong> LakeWatch (16 percent).<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> created the IWR 2002 Database to evaluate data in<br />

accordance with the methodology prescribed in the Identification <strong>of</strong> IWR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!