25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> 251<br />

100(B/A) where A = the 95 percentile <strong>of</strong> the reference population and B = observed<br />

value<br />

For percent Diptera, the following formula was used:<br />

100 (100-B)/(100-A) where A = the 95 percentile <strong>of</strong> the reference population and B<br />

= observed value<br />

An average LCI score was calculated by averaging the scores <strong>of</strong> the six metrics in<br />

the method: total number <strong>of</strong> taxa; total number <strong>of</strong> taxa belonging to the orders<br />

Ephemeroptera, Odonata, and Trichoptera (EOT taxa); percent EOT taxa; Shannon-<br />

Wiener Diversity Index score; Hulbert Index score; and percent Dipteran individuals.<br />

LCI calculations were only provided for clear lakes (< 20 platinum cobalt units [PCUs]).<br />

As macroinvertebrate-based indices have not been shown to assess colored lakes in<br />

<strong>Florida</strong> accurately (> 20 PCUs), they have been excluded from bioassessments. A poor<br />

or very poor rating based on the average score constituted a failed bioassessment, based<br />

on the Impaired Surface Waters Rule.<br />

STREAM CONDITION INDEX<br />

A total <strong>St</strong>ream Condition Index (SCI) score was calculated by adding the scores <strong>of</strong><br />

the seven metrics in the method, i.e., total number <strong>of</strong> taxa; total number <strong>of</strong> taxa belonging<br />

to the orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT taxa); percent<br />

Chironomid taxa; percent dominant taxa; percent Diptera; percent filter feeders; and<br />

<strong>Florida</strong> Index. A poor or very poor rating based on the total score constituted a failed<br />

bioassessment, based on the Impaired Surface Waters Rule. The Basin <strong>St</strong>atus Reports<br />

contain definitions and specific methods for the generation and analysis <strong>of</strong> bioassessment<br />

data.<br />

BIORECON<br />

To establish an impairment rating based on BioRecon data, three metrics were used:<br />

the <strong>Florida</strong> Index score, total number <strong>of</strong> taxa, and total number <strong>of</strong> EPT taxa. If all three<br />

metrics failed to meet thresholds, the water was deemed “impaired” based on the<br />

Impaired Surface Waters Rule.<br />

BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY STANDARD<br />

Quantitative data, generated through the use <strong>of</strong> Hester-Dendy artificial substrate<br />

samplers, were used to calculate Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index scores for paired<br />

background and test sites, as specified in the Biological Integrity <strong>St</strong>andard <strong>of</strong> Subsection<br />

62-302.530(11), F.A.C. One failure <strong>of</strong> the standard meant that a waterbody segment was<br />

listed as potentially impaired.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!