25.12.2014 Views

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Middle St. Johns - Florida Department of Environmental Protection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182<br />

Water Quality Assessment Report: <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong><br />

• Human-made canals, urban drainage ditches, and other artificial<br />

waterbody segments that are listed only due to exceedances <strong>of</strong> dissolved<br />

oxygen (DO) criteria; or<br />

• Waterbody segments that were not on the Planning List but were<br />

identified as impaired during Phase 2 <strong>of</strong> the watershed management<br />

cycle and were included on the Verified List, unless the segment<br />

meets the second high-priority criterion.<br />

• The EPA has also proposed assigning to this category the list <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

waterbody segments that the agency developed using its own<br />

evaluation methodology, until the <strong>Department</strong> has had the opportunity<br />

to investigate these waterbodies further.<br />

All segments not designated high or low priority are medium priority,<br />

and are prioritized based on the following factors:<br />

• The presence <strong>of</strong> Outstanding <strong>Florida</strong> Waters (OFW);<br />

• The presence <strong>of</strong> waterbody segments that fail to meet more than one<br />

designated use, i.e., aquatic life, primary contact and recreation, fish<br />

and shellfish consumption, and drinking water and protection <strong>of</strong><br />

human health;<br />

• The presence <strong>of</strong> waterbody segments that exceed an applicable water<br />

quality criterion or alternative threshold with a frequency <strong>of</strong> greater<br />

than 25 percent at a minimum confidence level <strong>of</strong> 90 percent;<br />

• The presence <strong>of</strong> waterbody segments that exceed more than one<br />

applicable water quality criterion; or<br />

• Administrative needs <strong>of</strong> the TMDL program, including meeting a<br />

TMDL development schedule agreed to with the EPA, basin priorities<br />

related to the <strong>Department</strong>’s watershed management approach,<br />

and the number <strong>of</strong> administratively continued permits in the basin.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> is adhering to the TMDL schedule established in the<br />

Consent Decree between the EPA and Earthjustice for waters on the 1998<br />

303(d) list that are also identified as impaired under the IWR.<br />

Table 5.1 lists the high-priority waters for TMDL development in the<br />

<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin. Figure 5.1 shows the locations <strong>of</strong> these waters and<br />

their watersheds<br />

Table 5.1: Priorities for TMDL Development in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> Basin<br />

WBID Waterbody Name TMDL Parameter<br />

2981 Lake Jesup Nutrients, Unionized Ammonia<br />

2081A Lake Jesup Near <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Johns</strong> River Nutrients<br />

3014 Crane <strong>St</strong>rand Drain DO, BOD, Fecal Coliforms, Total Coliforms<br />

3023 Crane <strong>St</strong>rand Fecal Coliforms, Total Coliforms<br />

3030 Long Branch Iron, Fecal Coliforms, Total Coliforms, DO, BOD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!