27.12.2014 Views

A Management Strategy for Oneida Lake and its ... - CNY RPDB Home

A Management Strategy for Oneida Lake and its ... - CNY RPDB Home

A Management Strategy for Oneida Lake and its ... - CNY RPDB Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing Double-Crested Cormorants<br />

Program Goal<br />

Manage the <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> cormorant population in order to alleviate <strong>and</strong> prevent conflicts with<br />

other public resources including other colonial-nesting waterbird species <strong>and</strong><br />

economically important recreational fisheries<br />

In 2003 the <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> Watershed Advisory Council identified double-crested cormorants as<br />

one of eight primary issues of concern in the <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> watershed. In response to this issue,<br />

the Watershed Advisory Council Board of Directors <strong>for</strong>mally voted to endorse the recommendations<br />

of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Cormorant Task Force <strong>and</strong> the<br />

actions identified in the publication titled, “<strong>Management</strong> of Double-Crested Cormorants to<br />

Protect Public Resources in New York – Statement of Findings” (revised May 14, 2004). A<br />

summary of the findings is found below.<br />

Problem Identification<br />

The double-crested cormorant, Phalacrocorax<br />

auritus, is a large, fish-eating waterbird native<br />

to North America that has been federally<br />

protected since 1972 by amendments to the<br />

Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Cormorants are<br />

colonial birds that nest in high densities in<br />

areas with abundant fish. These areas are often<br />

the same habitats used by other colonialnesting<br />

bird species.<br />

Double-crested cormorants were first observed<br />

in significant numbers on <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong><br />

in 1984. Cormorant numbers have grown<br />

from a single breeding pair in 1984 to a<br />

maximum of 365 documented breeding pairs<br />

in <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2000. Resident cormorant<br />

populations are seasonally augmented by<br />

migrating flocks in the spring <strong>and</strong> especially<br />

fall. Populations have reached historic highs<br />

due to a combination of factors including<br />

water quality improvements (including<br />

reduction in pesticide residues such as DDT<br />

which interfered with reproduction), increased<br />

food availability in breeding <strong>and</strong> wintering<br />

areas, <strong>and</strong> federal <strong>and</strong> state protection.<br />

Walleye <strong>and</strong> perch are the major components<br />

in the diet of <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> cormorants. Their<br />

diet also consists of gizzard shad, log perch,<br />

emerald shiners, pumpkinseed sunfish, burbot,<br />

white perch, rock bass, mudpuppies, smallmouth<br />

bass, white bass, white suckers, black<br />

crappie, <strong>and</strong> tessellated darters.<br />

Impacts<br />

In 2001, cormorants on <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> consumed<br />

an estimated 2.8 million fish of which<br />

2 million were subadult yellow perch <strong>and</strong><br />

350,000 were subadult walleye. 5 Loss of<br />

highly valued recreational fish species including<br />

walleye <strong>and</strong> yellow perch negatively<br />

impact the economy of the <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong><br />

region.<br />

Other impacts of high cormorant populations<br />

include their denuding of vegetation on<br />

isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> their competition <strong>for</strong> food <strong>and</strong><br />

habitat with other colonial nesting birds.<br />

Cormorants threaten the existence of other<br />

colonial-nesting waterbirds by physically<br />

5 VanDeValk, A.J., C.M. Adams, L.G. Rudstam, J.L. Forney,<br />

T.E. Brooking, M.A. Gerken, B.P. Young, <strong>and</strong> J.T. Hooper.<br />

2002. Comparison of angler <strong>and</strong> cormorant harvest of walleye<br />

<strong>and</strong> yellow perch in <strong>Oneida</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>, NY. Tran. Am. Fish. Soc.<br />

131: 27-39.<br />

page 70<br />

Chapter 3: Priority Areas

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!