30.12.2014 Views

Vol. 1(2) SEP 2011 - SAVAP International

Vol. 1(2) SEP 2011 - SAVAP International

Vol. 1(2) SEP 2011 - SAVAP International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Academic Research <strong>International</strong><br />

ISSN: 2223-9553<br />

<strong>Vol</strong>ume 1, Issue 2, September <strong>2011</strong><br />

EFFECTS OF STRONG COLUMN WEAK BEAM RATIO AS<br />

CONSTRAINT FOR STEEL FRAME OPTIMIZATION<br />

Mohammad Ghozi<br />

Bhayangkara Surabaya<br />

University and PhD Student of<br />

Sepuluh Nopember Institute of<br />

Technology, INDONESIA.<br />

mghozi2002@gmail.com<br />

Pujo Aji<br />

Sepuluh Nopember<br />

Institute of Technology<br />

INDONESIA.<br />

pujo@ce.its.ac.id<br />

Priyo Suprobo<br />

Sepuluh Nopember<br />

Institute of Technology<br />

INDONESIA.<br />

priyo@ce.its.ac.id<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

An approach is presented as usage of genetic algorithm (GA) concept for steel frame optimization.<br />

The purpose of this paper is to discuss differences between result of optimization with and without<br />

strong column weak beam concept for optimizing steel frame structure. The optimization processes<br />

are carried out through 660 members of 2D steel structure model using GA-SAP2000. With strong<br />

column weak beam ratio as constraint in optimization, it is not easier to raise the fitness value but the<br />

structure will have smaller total drift and good arranged column’s plastic modulus. It is concluded<br />

that strong column weak beam constraint is important and should be used in structural design.<br />

Keywords: Genetic algorithm, Optimization, Steel structure, SAP2000, Strong column weak beam.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

AISC Seismic has arranged ratio of flexural strength to make structures have “strong column weak<br />

beam” behaviour. With this limitation columns always have stronger flexural strength than beams at<br />

every joint. At this stage flexural strength is defined as plastic moment (AISC, 1999).<br />

The application of genetic and evolutionary computation to the automated design of structures has<br />

followed several avenues. The first is topology and shape optimization, in which the applications have<br />

included elastic truss structures subjected to static loading (Cai & Thiereut, 1993). There have also<br />

been research efforts devoted to developing algorithms for optimized structure topologies to satisfy<br />

user-determined natural frequencies. The second major area of automated design using genetic<br />

algorithms has been their application for optimal member sizing for truss structures using linear<br />

elastic analysis with U.S. design specifications (Adeli & Sarma, 2006).<br />

The final major application of genetic algorithms (GA) has been the automated design of steel frame<br />

structures. One excellent method was combining commercial finite element method (FEM) program<br />

with iteration method to find required area of steel reinforced concrete plate (Khennane, 2007) and<br />

commercial FEM program with GA in parallel computing method (Ghozi, et al, <strong>2011</strong>).<br />

Since we know the advantage of commercial FEM program for analyze and design structure and its<br />

combination with GA, it will be good for academics for using combination of commercial FEM-GA-<br />

Parallel computing for research in optimization. For this reason, it will be discussed the difference<br />

beetwen optimization result with and without “strong column weak beam”constraint.<br />

Copyright © <strong>2011</strong> <strong>SAVAP</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

www.savap.org.pk<br />

www.journals.savap.org.pk<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!