03.01.2015 Views

MAP-01-010 HFI Management Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

MAP-01-010 HFI Management Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

MAP-01-010 HFI Management Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 – <strong>HFI</strong> within Naval Capability Acquisition<br />

1.3.4.5 User Input to Equipment Interface Design<br />

Experience has demonstrated that the early involvement of users and RN subject<br />

matter experts is critical for the effective design of user-equipment interfaces.<br />

The <strong>HFI</strong> Programme therefore needs to ensure that such involvement is planned.<br />

Tools are available to support early simulation of user-equipment interfaces.<br />

Critical design issues, requiring user involvement, must be resolved efficiently<br />

and effectively. Scenario-based design walk-throughs and equipment<br />

prototyping are cost-effective techniques for user involvement when combined<br />

with the use of low-cost mock-ups.<br />

1.3.4.6 Use of Automation<br />

Equipment functions include computer-based, mechanical and electrical facilities<br />

for the operational role and to maintain habitability. During the platform and<br />

equipment design process decisions are made about the degree of automation<br />

and the role of human users and maintainers. The allocation of functions<br />

between human and equipment is a key process in the <strong>HFI</strong> Programme. The<br />

ultimate operational value and supportability of a platform and its equipment will<br />

hinge on obtaining the best balance between the use of automatic or mechanised<br />

solutions and human resources.<br />

The use of automation has a major impact on the size and composition of the<br />

complement. Failure to consider all of the tasks and duties required for<br />

equipment operation and maintenance, ship husbandry, damage control, mission<br />

requirements and domestic activities may result in unacceptable crew workload<br />

and subsequent limitations in vessel effectiveness.<br />

The allocation of tasks between human and equipment must form an explicit part<br />

of the design process. For example, computer-based systems can be used in<br />

virtually every area of a vessel from the Combat System to ship control<br />

equipment. The <strong>HFI</strong> Programme needs to ensure that the software design<br />

method provides sufficient information for the purpose of evaluating human task<br />

implications to determine operator workload, skill requirements, and humancomputer<br />

interface design and maintenance needs.<br />

1.3.4.7 System <strong>Integration</strong> <strong>HFI</strong> Issues<br />

System integration is the co-ordinated design and assessment of individual,<br />

team, equipment, layout and environmental issues. While specific <strong>Human</strong><br />

<strong>Factors</strong> work may address each of these issues in relative isolation, it is only<br />

through an integrated approach that their joint effect can be properly assessed.<br />

This approach is equally important whether the system is developed to meet new<br />

requirements or comprises commercial-off-the-shelf components.<br />

1.3.5 System Safety <strong>HFI</strong> Issues<br />

The inherent ability of the system to be used, operated and maintained without<br />

risk of injury or death to personnel must be addressed in the <strong>HFI</strong> Programme.<br />

These adverse conditions may occur when the system is functioning in a normal<br />

or an abnormal manner. Every design decision may impact on system safety to a<br />

greater or lesser degree and may affect the risks to humans from damage,<br />

equipment malfunction or operator error. These risks must be continually<br />

Nov 2006 Page 1-25 Issue 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!