03.01.2015 Views

MAP-01-010 HFI Management Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

MAP-01-010 HFI Management Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

MAP-01-010 HFI Management Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 – <strong>HFI</strong> Processes and Mechanisms<br />

3. Equipment Capability Acceptance – The DEC is the Acceptance<br />

Authority but the CWG is closely involved in the development of the<br />

Integrated Test, Evaluation and Acceptance Plan, the review of the<br />

Acceptance Submission by the IPT Leader, advice on formal Acceptance<br />

and subsequent Release to Service.<br />

The responsibility for <strong>HFI</strong> is shared between the Capability Working Group and<br />

the IPT. <strong>HFI</strong> helps the IPT and CWG work together, trading off changes that<br />

might be needed in equipment with changes to people and procedures to ensure<br />

total system effectiveness.<br />

2.1.4 The Second Customer Function<br />

Customer 2 is the user of the equipment capability and has two key roles, Core<br />

Leadership and Pivotal <strong>Management</strong> role. These are discussed below.<br />

2.1.4.1 Core Leadership<br />

This role is undertaken by the Single Service Chiefs and supports the ECC<br />

decisions on equipment capability by providing advice and experience on the full<br />

range of factors making up military capability, including concepts and doctrine,<br />

sustainability, training, force structure and personnel. Single Service Chiefs are<br />

responsible for ensuring that the Joint Capabilities Board and CWGs receive<br />

appropriate input on such matters for future equipment capability.<br />

2.1.4.2 Pivotal <strong>Management</strong><br />

This role is undertaken by the end-users of equipment, primarily the Front Line<br />

and Training Commands. This role focuses on in-service equipment and<br />

includes responsibility for defining the in-service outputs sought from the IPT and<br />

monitors IPT delivery performance. As the new equipment enters service,<br />

Customer 2 takes on the lead customer role and confirms with the IPT the level<br />

of in-service support required including availability, sustainability, and training to<br />

be provided.<br />

2.1.5 The Integrated Project Team<br />

The Integrated Project Team (IPT) is responsible for translating the ECC’s<br />

expression of the user requirements (the User Requirement Document (URD))<br />

into an output-based statement of what the system must do to meet these<br />

requirements (the System Requirement Document (SRD)). The IPT will also<br />

devise and cost equipment solutions to meet the SRD, produce the material<br />

required to support the Customer’s Main Gate Approval and manage the<br />

development, manufacture, in-service support and eventual disposal of the<br />

equipment. At the Manufacture phase, the control of the IPT passes from the<br />

DPA to the DLO. The IPT deals with the ECC mainly through the DEC.<br />

Nov 2006 Page 2-5 Issue 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!