03.01.2015 Views

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

xiii<br />

I.2. <strong>Global</strong> change: general<br />

In complex systems, an external forcing is either damped by negative feedbacks or<br />

escalated by positive feedbacks. A switch from one mode to another makes evolution of<br />

such systems intermittent rather than gradual, hence the inconsistency of gradualistic<br />

theories.<br />

The system we deal with in global change research is the biosphere as defined by<br />

Vernadsky (1967 <strong>and</strong> earlier work), i.e. the shell of the earth encompassing all living<br />

matter <strong>and</strong> the products of metabolism, including those buried in sedimentary rocks. This<br />

is an open system perpetually reproducing organic life by recycling matter, with the main<br />

source of energy outside the planet.<br />

The biospheric functions are directed by the goal of biological production with minimal<br />

wastes. The biospheric structures are determined by their functions in the life-producing<br />

system. We are concerned with structural changes (such as the loss of biological<br />

diversity) but these are on the surface, conveying a deeper level of functional change.<br />

Neither structure nor function can be fully understood without unravelling the history.<br />

This is what palaeontology is about.<br />

The biosphere is superimposed upon the earth crust, hydrosphere <strong>and</strong> atmosphere.<br />

Heterogeneity of these substrates predetermines division of the biosphere<br />

into a great number of life-producing units, ecosystems, with their specific biotas.<br />

The ecosystems are linked by a perpetual flow of matter, through the continental<br />

runoff to the oceans <strong>and</strong> a backflow of oceanic production over trophic channels,<br />

providing for functional integration of the biosphere. An impact affecting any of<br />

the biospheric functions would inflict a reaction spreading over the mosaic of interrelated<br />

ecosystems.<br />

Evolution of functional systems is governed by the general system laws, which,<br />

for closed systems, are the classical thermodynamic laws. Closed systems evolve in<br />

the direction of a maximal entropy production. Conversely, an open system minimizes<br />

its entropy production (Bertalanfy, 1960; Prigogine, 1980; Kondepude & Prigogine,<br />

1999) by drawing matter <strong>and</strong> energy from external sources <strong>and</strong> by exporting<br />

wastes. Each open system thus affects the neighbouring systems <strong>and</strong> is in turn affected<br />

by them. Any talk of biotic evolution going on independently of any environmental<br />

change is therefore meaningless. A history of the biosphere is the outcome<br />

of complex interactions with cosmic, geological <strong>and</strong>, recently, mental systems leaving<br />

their traces in the fossil record.<br />

The Darwinian metaphor of the geological record as a book written in an unknown<br />

language, with most pages torn away <strong>and</strong> the remaining showing a few lines each, is a<br />

frustrating reminder of the fact that the still popular theory of evolution was built on a<br />

notoriously unsafe theoretical, as well as factual, foundation. Not only is the record more<br />

complete presently than in the Darwinian time, but also room for speculations is narrowed<br />

by the modern methods of measuring evolution rates. The once popular notion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!