03.01.2015 Views

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 8. Ecosystem evolution<br />

283<br />

pioneer riparian trees, such as poplars. It was fairly common in the Mesozoic gymnosperm<br />

forests while the bark-droppers prevailed in the Carboniferous lepidophyte forests. In the<br />

ecologically marginal environments (near the tree-line), large plants tend to degrade to a<br />

lower habit (Stevens & Fox, 1991) with biomass reallocated to underground parts. In grassl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

the underground biomass amounts to about 25-58% of the total (Titlyanova et al.,<br />

1996). It might have been even larger in the rhizomatic early l<strong>and</strong> plant communities.<br />

VIII.2.1. Biomass build-up <strong>and</strong> fluctuations<br />

The evolution of ecosystems, <strong>and</strong> of the biosphere as a whole, is directed toward the<br />

goal of efficiency in producing living matter from non-living matter with a minimal waste<br />

in the form of dead mass. Hence, the biomass to dead mass ratio tends to increase with<br />

evolution. This theoretical expectation is supported by the fossil record. The Early Proterozoic<br />

microbial mats of a few cyanobacterial species produced a disproportionately<br />

large dead mass preserved as shungites. They also contributed to accumulation of b<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

iron ores amounting to about 20% of contemporaneous sedimentation. The subsequent<br />

Late Proterozoic mat communities were much more diverse, yet they left a relatively<br />

modest dead mass (Hofmann, 1976; Bauld, 1981).<br />

The appearance of terrestrial plant life entailed a multifold increase in the total biospheric<br />

biomass that was further elevated with the terrestrial vegetation exp<strong>and</strong>ing from<br />

wetl<strong>and</strong>s over dryl<strong>and</strong>s. Large trees appeared already in the Late Devonian but they<br />

were telomic rather than leafy, thus producing a much smaller above-ground biomass<br />

than modern trees of a comparable size. On evidence of telomic mats, the arboreal<br />

archaeopterids were shoot-droppers (IV.3). In addition, most Devonian plants were rhizomatic,<br />

<strong>and</strong> even in the Carboniferous arboreal wetl<strong>and</strong>s a contribution of positive geotropism,<br />

forming massive stigmaria, was considerably greater than in the extant ecological<br />

analogues.<br />

Fossil fuels <strong>and</strong> kerogen-rich deposits are accumulations of buried dead mass. The<br />

biomass of extinct biotic communities can be approximately assessed by analogy with<br />

their extant ecological equivalents (as in the Cretaceous example, VIII.2.3). When an<br />

ecological equivalence of extinct <strong>and</strong> extant communities is problematic, as in the case<br />

of Carboniferous peatl<strong>and</strong> vegetation, comparisons can be made on the basis of arboreal<br />

to non-arboreal plant ratios, tree size <strong>and</strong> diversity as the biomass correlates.<br />

Thus, the Carboniferous wetl<strong>and</strong> forests were sources of huge coal measures, indicating<br />

high dead mass production rates, while their extant analogues accumulate a relatively<br />

small dead mass. They were inferior to the present-day tropical rainforests both in<br />

the tree/herb ratio (about 50% against 70%) <strong>and</strong> tree size (up to 40 m against 60 m),<br />

indicating an altogether smaller biomass. The Carboniferous assemblages from a single<br />

locality, typically accumulating plant debris from about 1 hectare of tree st<strong>and</strong>s (Krassilov,<br />

1972a), are oligodominant with no more than 10 tree species, whereas the extant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!