03.01.2015 Views

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

Terrestrial Palaeoecology and Global Change

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9. Crises<br />

339<br />

IX. CRISES<br />

The geological record is punctuated by biotic turnovers that coincide with the major<br />

tectonic, eustatic <strong>and</strong> climatic events (Krassilov, 1969, 1973a, 1978b, 1995a, etc.; Wethey,<br />

1985; Erwin, 1990; Stanley & Yang, 1994; Retallack, 1995). Evolutionary significance<br />

of such biospheric events, discarded by the traditional evolutionary theory, presently<br />

attracts more attention in view of the nascent environmental hazards.<br />

Etymologically, crisis means a turning point. The major geochronological boundaries,<br />

such as the Permian/Triassic (PTB) ca. 290 Ma or the Cretaceous/Tertiary (KTB) ca.<br />

65 Ma, are marked by the conspicuous diversity lows, hence they are turning points in<br />

respect to the manistream build-up of biological diversity.<br />

In historic sciences, patterns emerge from repetition. To arrive at regularities of biospheric<br />

crises we have to compare the sequences of geological <strong>and</strong> biological events<br />

across the critical boundaries. As will be shown later in the chapter, the similarities of<br />

transboundary sequences involve the geomagnetic, sea-level <strong>and</strong> magmatic events, the<br />

lithological, geochemical <strong>and</strong> isotopic anomalies, <strong>and</strong> the turnovers of biotic communities.<br />

The Permian/Triassic <strong>and</strong> the Cretaceous/Tertiary crises, whatever the causes, are<br />

generally held to have been the most severe in the history of the Earth. As such they<br />

provide a testing ground for evolutionary models, as well as for stratigraphic practices.<br />

It must be reminded here that chronostratigraphic boundaries are currently conceived<br />

of as time levels defined by selected points (spikes) in their type sections.<br />

Conventionality of the boundary choice is rooted in the Lyellian–Darwinian gradualistic<br />

interpretation of the fossil record <strong>and</strong>, at a deeper philosophical level, in the principle<br />

of continuity denying natural boundaries as such. Stratigraphic methodology (e.g.<br />

Remane et al., 1996) light-heartedly confuses time with history, disregarding the developmental<br />

discontinuity of geobiological systems that confer a distinctness on chronostratigraphic<br />

divisions.<br />

In recent years, the conventional golden spikes have been substantiated, first, by the<br />

iridium spike at the KTB <strong>and</strong>, later, by the isotopic δ 13 C spikes at this <strong>and</strong> other major<br />

boundaries. Their interpretation as the signatures of occasional events (e.g., impacts of<br />

extraterrestrial bodies) inflicting a radical turn upon the course of the earth’s history<br />

implies no regularities of evolutionary developments. It remains to be learned if such<br />

indeterministic attitudes agree with what is actually known about the turning points.<br />

IX.1. Transboundary trends<br />

In both the PTB <strong>and</strong> KTB examples, geomagnetic signatures indicate a major event<br />

before the boundary, following a long quiescent period (Fig. 137). In the Permian, a<br />

period of constant polarity lasted from the Sakmarian, ca. 285 Ma, to mid-Tatarian (Capitanian),<br />

ca. 260 Ma (Jin et al., 1997, 1998). Starting from the latter date, constant polar-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!