06.01.2015 Views

Cryptology - Unofficial St. Mary's College of California Web Site

Cryptology - Unofficial St. Mary's College of California Web Site

Cryptology - Unofficial St. Mary's College of California Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

164 CHAPTER 8. POLYALPHABETIC CIPHERS<br />

(a) On November 8, 1913 The Adjutant General’s Office in the War<br />

Department, Washington sent the following to the Chief <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>aff,<br />

U.S. Army.<br />

HBYID EEKRA VVOIU RROGI FUIIJ ONADJ XKRBO SKPYU VFZGF JRZBV<br />

ZYKFS WYOMV MCIVP CYIUO IOPVV RSFSW PWKLQ SQVFG VKQTF VGKZI<br />

ZHSMR FIQQO XRYRZ TMSXD RBOWM DOEBK GIPHI KYWN.<br />

AAPH.<br />

What did it say<br />

(b) The HQ <strong>of</strong> Coast Defenses <strong>of</strong> Chesapeake Bay, Fort Monroe VA,<br />

struggled with this new cipher, as they reported in a letter <strong>of</strong> Nov 9,<br />

1913. To attempt a decipherment <strong>of</strong> a Larrabee message they first<br />

crossed “out the inadmissible code letters”, and then used (probably)<br />

the Red code book to treat the remaining letters as code groups.<br />

This gave “Appropriations for the 4th quarter British Minister J. F.<br />

Reynolds Landis Henry J. Nichols Facts do not justify having party<br />

arrested” as the message. Trying a slightly different technique gave<br />

“Congress did not appropriate merited unknown unknown permanent<br />

arrangement.”<br />

They eventually realized their mistake:<br />

“It was evident that the meaning was not that which was intended.<br />

[And, after further consideration] It is thought that this<br />

message might be translated by the Larrabee Cipher Code Card<br />

which was sent to the Depot Quartermaster, Newport News, Va.,<br />

on March 10, 1913, but which has apparently been misplacedby<br />

[sic] that <strong>of</strong>ficer as he is unable to furnish it.”<br />

Then on November 12 the same HQ sent<br />

ESAID FRTRQ DTTFV CRHOI DOSCN FNENF ITBRZ GMSHI RQSMH FHYNJ<br />

ZQMEI LFSJJ AOIZA DJWEF WJVCI SRLIG BHLYM SXVLA VWFFV ERKKS<br />

DURVJ GQEDF ULRGO PMSVR OSZGU QLVLQ JHQCI WHFIM EIIU<br />

Have they figured it out What does the message say<br />

(c) How is the Larrabee cipher related to the Vignere<br />

24. (a) Two very long message have been enciphered with a Vigenère cipher<br />

using the same five letter keyword. How do the ciphertexts’ frequency<br />

charts compare (“Very long” here indicates that the plaintext’s<br />

frequencies are close to that <strong>of</strong> typical English.)<br />

(b) Continuing, how the two ciphertext’s Φ values compare<br />

(c) Two very long message have been enciphered with Vigenère ciphers<br />

using five letter keywords. If the two ciphertexts’ frequency charts<br />

are very similar, can we conclude that the keywords were the same<br />

If yes, why If no, why not, and what may we conclude<br />

25. Explain in your own words why an endless, senseless key is needed for<br />

perfect secrecy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!