09.01.2015 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Transportation's</strong> <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 1<br />

Induced Travel Demand<br />

Induced travel demand can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as any <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> travel result<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

improved travel conditions. The <strong>in</strong>duced VMT generally results from longer trips,<br />

as well as additional trips and shifts of travelers from other modes. Over the longer<br />

term, improved travel conditions can also impact land use, further impact<strong>in</strong>g trip<br />

lengths and modal shifts. It is an important consideration for system efficiency and<br />

travel activity strategies, affect<strong>in</strong>g the impacts on travel and correspond<strong>in</strong>g GHG<br />

benefits of most of these strategies.<br />

In particular, bottleneck relief, traffic management, and traveler <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

strategies lead to additional travel by reduc<strong>in</strong>g congestion and travel times; this<br />

additional travel reduces and, <strong>in</strong> the long run, potentially elim<strong>in</strong>ates the<br />

effectiveness of these measures <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g GHG emissions. To a lesser extent,<br />

travel behavior strategies that reduce on-road trips also result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced demand,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>itial reduction of highway travel times will draw some additional traffic<br />

back onto these facilities. Induced demand is related to the basic economic concept<br />

of elasticity, mean<strong>in</strong>g that a decrease <strong>in</strong> cost (such as travel time) results <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> consumption. Sources referenced <strong>in</strong> this report applied short- and longterm<br />

elasticities to estimate <strong>in</strong>duced demand effects, and used adjusted travel<br />

volumes to calculate fuel consumption and GHG emissions. Strategies that reduce<br />

VMT by mak<strong>in</strong>g highway travel more expensive – such as mileage-based fees,<br />

congestion-based tolls, or <strong>in</strong>creased gas taxes – are assumed to result <strong>in</strong> no <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

demand, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> monetary costs suppresses the demand for additional<br />

travel. Use of “congestion pric<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>in</strong> connection with bottleneck relief strategies<br />

may limit offsets from <strong>in</strong>duced demand.<br />

While the concept of <strong>in</strong>duced demand is widely acknowledged <strong>in</strong> the transportation<br />

profession, estimates of its magnitude are a source of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty and debate. A<br />

range of plausible estimates from the literature would significantly impact <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

demand and GHG calculations for many strategies. U.S. DOT is design<strong>in</strong>g research<br />

to provide a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of the role of <strong>in</strong>duced demand <strong>in</strong> offsett<strong>in</strong>g GHG<br />

improvements from congestion reduction strategies.<br />

This study used the same <strong>in</strong>duced demand assumptions as those recently used <strong>in</strong><br />

the Federal Highway Adm<strong>in</strong>istration’s (FHWA) Highway Economic Requirements<br />

System (HERS) model. The version of HERS used for the 2008 U.S. DOT Conditions<br />

and Performance Report uses an elasticity of VMT with respect to total travel cost of<br />

-0.4 for the short run and -0.8 for the long run. To compare an elasticity for fuel<br />

prices to an elasticity for total travel costs, one would need to multiply the fuel price<br />

elasticity by a factor of three to ten, s<strong>in</strong>ce fuel cost represents only about a tenth to a<br />

third of total operat<strong>in</strong>g costs. Small and Van Dender (2007) estimate an elasticity of<br />

VMT with respect to fuel prices of between -0.02 and -0.03 for the short-run and of<br />

an elasticity between -0.11 and -0.15 for the long-run. For short- to medium-run<br />

responses of VMT to changes <strong>in</strong> fuel prices, Ew<strong>in</strong>g et al. (2008) estimated an<br />

elasticity of -0.17. The question of how strongly VMT responds to changes <strong>in</strong> travel<br />

costs is far from settled, with ongo<strong>in</strong>g research cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to produce new estimates.<br />

Additional details on the calculations performed by the sources cited <strong>in</strong> this study<br />

can be found <strong>in</strong> Section 4.1.4 and 4.2 of Volume 2 and Appendix A.<br />

3-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!