SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER
SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER
SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>SIBER</strong><br />
Science Plan and Implementation Strategy<br />
Hi s t o r i c a l ba c k g r o u n d<br />
In comparison to the Atlantic and the North Pacific the IO has received relatively little research<br />
attention. It was essentially neglected in the early days of oceanography; the Challenger<br />
expedition (1872-1876) made a single leg from Cape Town to Melbourne (see review by<br />
Benson and Rehbock, 2002). The first major expedition to the IO (principally the AS) – the<br />
John Murray Expedition - was undertaken on an Egyptian vessel, the Mabahiss, in 1933-1934<br />
(Sewell, 1934), during which the intense mesopelagic oxygen deficiency was first recorded.<br />
During preparation and execution of the International Geophysical Year (1957-1958),<br />
oceanographic exploration of the southern IO was carried out by Australian, French, Japanese,<br />
New Zealand and Soviet researchers. Nevertheless, the IO was one of the least known seas<br />
when the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) planned the International Indian<br />
Ocean Expedition (IIOE, 1960–1965). This basinwide survey resulted in a comprehensive<br />
hydrographic atlas (Wyrtki, 1971) and a number of regional studies (e.g. Swallow and Bruce,<br />
1966). Subsequent research built on the work of that expedition (for further summary of early<br />
AS efforts, see Wiggert et al., 2005). The IIOE also led to capacity building in the region,<br />
particularly in India where the National Institute of Oceanography (NIO) was established in<br />
1966. Over subsequent years, research at NIO has greatly improved our understanding of<br />
oceanographic processes in the AS and BoB.<br />
The next intensive study involving researchers from outside the region was the Indian Ocean<br />
Experiment (INDEX, 1976-1979), which investigated the physical response of the Somali<br />
Current to the SWM (Swallow et al., 1983) and provided a first look at the associated biological<br />
and chemical distributions (Smith and Codispoti, 1980). The two institutes in Sevastopol,<br />
Ukraine (Marine Hydrophysical Institute and Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas)<br />
undertook ten expeditions mostly in the 1980s (Goldman and Livingston, 1994). However, in<br />
comparison to the Atlantic and the North Pacific, there have been very few studies and major<br />
expeditions in the IO.<br />
The next cycle of investigations began with the Netherlands Indian Ocean Program (NIOP,<br />
1992-1993; see review by Smith, 2005), part of the international Joint Global Ocean Flux Study<br />
(JGOFS), which focused on the western AS. Due to the uniqueness of the region, JGOFS<br />
selected the AS as one of four areas for detailed process studies during the 1990s. These<br />
investigations focused on the biogeochemical dynamics of the central and western AS and<br />
were largely limited the upper 500 to 1000m of the water column. The World Ocean Circulation<br />
Experiment (WOCE), implemented at about the same time, had a much wider geographical<br />
coverage in the IO. Although there have been expeditions mounted by individual countries<br />
(India, France, Germany, Japan, UK, and the USA), focused primarily on studies of physical<br />
processes, there have been no coordinated international expeditions since JGOFS, focusing<br />
on the biogeochemistry and/or ecology of either the pelagic realm or the benthos in the IO.<br />
One notable nationally coordinated effort, which may be viewed as a follow-up to the JGOFS<br />
AS efforts, is the Bay of Bengal Process Studies (BOBPS) program organized by the Indian<br />
oceanographic community (Madhupratap et al., 2003). Nevertheless, more than a decade has<br />
passed since the last major international research program in the IO ended. Efforts to mount<br />
a new program need to be initiated to consider the important questions that emerged from<br />
JGOFS that have not yet been addressed, as well as some exciting new questions that have<br />
arisen in recent years (see below).<br />
7