10.01.2015 Views

SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER

SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER

SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SIBER</strong><br />

Science Plan and Implementation Strategy<br />

Moreover, the degree to which Fe limitation is active over the entire basin, and any linkages<br />

of its spatio-temporal variability to monsoonal forcing, are open questions (Behrenfeld et al.,<br />

2009; Mackie et al., 2008; Wiggert et al., 2006; Piketh et al., 2000; Mc Gowan et al., 2000).<br />

There are profound physical and biogeochemical differences between the AS and the BoB.<br />

The AS is a globally important zone of open ocean denitrification (Naqvi et al., 2005), where<br />

NO 3 and NO 2 are converted to N 2 O and N 2 gas, which are then released to the atmosphere<br />

(Fig. 3). Thus, denitrification removes N from the ocean and generates N 2 O, which is a<br />

prominent greenhouse gas (Ramaswamy et al., 2001). This process occurs in oxygendepleted<br />

subsurface waters (200–800m) in the eastern-central AS and contributes ~20% to<br />

global open ocean denitrification (Codispoti et al., 2001). In contrast, mesopelagic dissolved<br />

oxygen concentrations in the BoB are slightly higher so it remains poised just above the<br />

denitrification threshold. What are the relative roles of biological oxygen demand from surface<br />

organic matter export versus circulation and ventilation in maintaining subtle differences in the<br />

deep oxygen field along with the profound differences in biogeochemical cycling in these two<br />

regions How have these differences been maintained over the last few decades and how are<br />

they likely to change in response to global climate change Recent modeling studies suggest<br />

that OMZs will expand in response to global warming (Doney, 2010; Stramma et al., 2008),<br />

but uncertainties in model predictions are large, especially in the IO where global simulation<br />

models fail to reproduce the observed oxygen distributions. It should also be noted that the<br />

northern IO contains about two thirds of the global continental margin area in contact with<br />

oxygen deficient (O 2 < 0.3 ml l-1) water (Codispoti et al., 2001), which is expected to expand<br />

and significantly impact benthic biogeochemical and ecological processes. Yet currently, rather<br />

little is known about these low oxygen impacts (Cowie, 2005).<br />

The IO may also be a globally important zone of nitrogen fixation, where N 2 is split by<br />

diazotrophic cyanobacteria and converted to ammonium that can be readily utilized by<br />

phytoplankton. It has been estimated that 30-40% of euphotic zone nitrate in the AS is derived<br />

from N 2 fixation (Brandes et al., 1998) and this region’s annual input of new N via this process<br />

has been estimated to be 3.3 Tg N yr-1 (Bange et al., 2005). However, there are very few direct<br />

N 2 fixation rate measurements from the IO. Thus, while it is agreed that the IO plays important<br />

roles in the global N cycle and budget, there is still not enough information to quantify the net<br />

atmosphere - ocean N flux in this basin.<br />

Gl o b a l c h a n g e a n d a n t h r o p o g e n i c i m p a c t s<br />

The AS and BoB differ markedly in terms of freshwater flux and terrestrial nutrient loading<br />

(Seitzinger et al., 2005). The AS experiences net evaporation, whereas the BoB has large<br />

freshwater inputs from direct rainfall and surrounding major river systems such as the Ganges-<br />

Brahmaputra complex (Fig. 4). Coastal environments in the BoB are particularly vulnerable due<br />

to high river nutrient loadings in surrounding countries that are experiencing rapid increases<br />

in population density and economic growth (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005).<br />

Cholera in Bangladesh has already been linked to changes in sea surface temperature and<br />

height (Lobitz et al., 2000). To what extent are coastal environments in the BoB impacted by<br />

anthropogenic effects How will they be impacted in the future What are the potential human<br />

consequences<br />

Overall the AS is a source of CO 2 to the atmosphere because of elevated pCO 2 within<br />

the SWM-driven upwelling (Fig. 5). Whether the BoB is a CO 2 source or sink remains illdefined<br />

due to sparse sampling in both space and time (Bates et al., 2006a). The southern IO<br />

appears to be a strong net CO 2 sink, but the factors that maintain this sink are unclear; cold<br />

temperatures certainly increase CO 2 solubility in the austral winter, but there is also evidence<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!