10.01.2015 Views

SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER

SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER

SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SIBER</strong><br />

Science Plan and Implementation Strategy<br />

Ap p e n d i x III.<br />

Is s u e s to b e c o n s i d e r e d in <strong>SIBER</strong><br />

m o d e l d e v e l o p m e n t<br />

This appendix is based upon recommendations put forward in Appendix III of the ICED Science<br />

Plan and Implementation Strategy (Murphy et al., 2008). <strong>SIBER</strong> will therefore adopt a strategy<br />

for model development that is consistent with ICED.<br />

One of the first challenges to address is to define the theoretical and technical process required<br />

to model whole ocean biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem dynamics. It is imperative to<br />

identify the main areas and building blocks that will provide the underlying understanding<br />

required to inform and evaluate these models. Some key science areas and associated model<br />

requirements are listed below.<br />

Objective 1: To understand the structure and dynamics of biogeochemical cycles and<br />

ecosystem dynamics in the Indian Ocean and how they might be affected by climate<br />

change and anthropogenic impacts<br />

The development of models of IO biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem dynamics is still at an<br />

early stage and much of the work undertaken to date has been of restricted geographical or<br />

trophic scope. There are major questions regarding the criteria that should be used to develop<br />

realistic models of IO ecosystems. Model development should involve consideration of the<br />

following issues:<br />

1. The development of integrated biogeochemical and ecosystem models must be<br />

done in conjunction with experimental and field studies to provide the basis for model<br />

parameterizations.<br />

2. A range of approaches to food web representation is required, involving models with<br />

different spatial, temporal and trophic complexity. Specific issues include the effects of<br />

horizontal advection of chemical and biological materials (see below) and the effects of<br />

behavioral processes, such as vertical migration of plankton or predator-prey interactions.<br />

The importance of energy transfer from phytoplankton to upper trophic levels in structuring<br />

food webs, and the spatial and temporal resolution required for coupling lower trophic<br />

level models with those developed for top predators are important issues, as are regional<br />

differences and the links between benthic and pelagic systems, particularly in coastal<br />

regions.<br />

3. The development of coupled physical-biological models will require close collaboration<br />

with physical modeling groups. As a basis for <strong>SIBER</strong> modeling efforts physical models<br />

that provide outputs relevant to the scales of operation of the biological processes under<br />

consideration are required, for example such models may include: basinwide atmosphereocean<br />

models (e.g. OFAM/BLUElink), coupled models for key regions of the IO, such as the<br />

AS, the BoB, the equatorial zone, and the Leeuwin and Agulhas Current systems, and high<br />

resolution mesoscale (10s-100s km) models of shelf and cross-shelf, island and frontal<br />

regions and processes.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!