SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER
SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER
SIBER SPIS sept 2011.pdf - IMBER
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>SIBER</strong><br />
Science Plan and Implementation Strategy<br />
within the equatorial and southern tropical IO during fall (Fig. 12). This develops as a result<br />
of the combined weaker Wyrtki Jet and anomalous winds in the east that promote shoaling of<br />
the eastern thermocline/nutracline. Analysis of a remote-sensing based production algorithm<br />
indicates that carbon uptake can double (Murtugudde et al., 1999; Wiggert et al., 2009). How<br />
does the altered physical environment of the IOD act to redistribute primary production, export<br />
production and carbon flux throughout the IO and to what degree do IOD manifestations<br />
modulate the influence of the higher frequency-mechanisms described above (e.g. the<br />
MJO) Do the anomalous atmospheric forcings that stimulate IOD appearance also result in<br />
pronounced change of atmospheric dust (and Fe) deposition patterns<br />
During the 1997/98 IOD, there were also significant responses in the central AS and southern<br />
BoB (Vinayachandran and Mathew, 2003; Wiggert et al., 2002) (Fi gs. 12 a n d 13). Moreover,<br />
during this IOD catch per unit effort (CPUE) for the equatorial IO tuna fishery shifted eastward<br />
(Marsac and Le Blanc, 1999; Menard et al., 2007) and there were catastrophic losses of coral<br />
communities in western subtropical waters (Spencer et al., 2000). Is this diverse assortment<br />
of ecosystem responses typical or is there significant variation in how IOD events alter<br />
biogeochemical processes within the equator and STIO, or the other IO regions How do these<br />
perturbations combine and propagate through the food web and influence apex predators such<br />
as tuna Finally, what are the socio-economic impacts of the IOD Rainfall patterns around the<br />
IO are significantly altered (Ashok et al., 2004; Meyers et al., 2007; Saji and Yamagata, 2003),<br />
which must also modify patterns of runoff and nutrient loading in coastal waters of the IO rim<br />
nations. Do these influence coastal fisheries or human health directly To what degree does<br />
the IOD impact the intensity of coastal and open ocean OMZs and the unique biogeochemical<br />
cycles and fluxes that are associated with them<br />
Th e m e 3: Ph y s i c a l, b i o g e o c h e m i c a l a n d e c o l o g i c a l c o n t r a s t s<br />
b e t w e e n t h e Ar a b i a n Se a a n d t h e Ba y o f Be n g a l<br />
How do differences in natural and anthropogenic forcings impact the biogeochemical cycles<br />
and ecosystem dynamics of the AS and the BoB<br />
Ba c k g r o u n d<br />
Although both the AS and the BoB are strongly influenced by the monsoons and are similar<br />
in terms of size, latitude and proximity to the northern land boundary, they also have many<br />
important physical, biogeochemical and ecological differences. These differences are<br />
expressed, for example, in their response to global warming, which is much stronger in the AS<br />
than in the BoB (Fig. 14), as well as in CO 2 emission. While the AS is clearly a net emitter of<br />
CO 2 to the atmosphere (Goyet et al., 1998; Sarma et al., 1998), the BoB seems to be a sink in<br />
winter and a weak source in summer (Fig. 5).<br />
The most striking difference between the two basins is the impact of the monsoons. The<br />
SWM winds are stronger over the AS, forming an intense atmospheric (Findlater) jet (Fig. 2,<br />
u p p e r r i g ht) that drives vigorous upwelling along the coasts of Oman, Yemen and Somalia,<br />
as indicated by high chlorophyll concentrations (Fig. 2, b o t t o m r i g ht). Surface circulation in<br />
both basins reverses seasonally (Fig. 2, m i d d l e p a n e l s) but chlorophyll-rich filaments, jets<br />
and eddies that extend offshore can be seen only in the western AS (Fig. 2, b o t t o m r i g ht).<br />
Upwelling-favorable winds also blow northeast along the east coast of India during the SWM<br />
(Fig. 2, u p p e r r i g ht), but they are much weaker and therefore do not generate such a strong<br />
surface upwelling signature. In general, the SWM winds produce much higher levels of surface<br />
kinetic energy in the AS compared to the BoB. Similarly, during the NEM the winds blow from<br />
the northeast over the AS and the BoB. However, the winds reaching the AS from the Tibetan<br />
Plateau are colder and dryer and impinge upon a less stratified and more saline surface water<br />
25