14.01.2015 Views

Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

National <strong>Evaluation</strong> Study Components<br />

Measures<br />

Domain Instrument Phases Used<br />

Services Received Multi-Sector Service Contacts Form II–V<br />

Service Experience &<br />

Satisfaction<br />

Family Satisfaction Questionnaire (FSQ); Youth<br />

Satisfaction Questionnaire (YSQ) (Brunk, Santiago,<br />

Ewell, & Watts, 1997)<br />

Youth Services Survey (YSS), Youth Services Survey–<br />

Family (YSS–F) (Brunk, Koch, & McCall, 2000)<br />

I–III<br />

IV–V<br />

Cultural Competence Culturally Competent Service Provision (CCSP) IV–V<br />

Services <strong>and</strong> Costs Study<br />

Using existing cost data in agency management information systems [MIS] <strong>and</strong> budgets, this study<br />

describes the types of services used by children <strong>and</strong> families, their utilization patterns, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

associated costs. Changes were made to this study after 2005 to provide communities with st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

templates for data about flexible fund expenditures, <strong>and</strong> to further st<strong>and</strong>ardize the delivery of crossagency<br />

service <strong>and</strong> cost data. Because access to service <strong>and</strong> cost data varies among communities,<br />

this study has used a tiered approach which accommodates availability of information from a single<br />

child-serving system <strong>and</strong> multiple child-serving systems is employed.<br />

Sustainability Study<br />

Added in 2000 to assess communities 5 years post-funding, this study obtains information about (a)<br />

availability of specific services in the system of care, (b) implementation of system of care principles,<br />

(c) achievement of objectives related to system of care implementation, (d) role <strong>and</strong> impact of various<br />

factors on the development or maintenance of the system of care, <strong>and</strong> (e) effectiveness of various<br />

general <strong>and</strong> financing strategies for sustaining systems of care. Phase I communities were assessed 5<br />

years post-funding <strong>and</strong> communities funded in 1997 were assessed in their final year of funding with a<br />

Web survey <strong>and</strong> telephone interviews with key individuals in the communities <strong>and</strong> at the State level.<br />

Communities funded in 1998–2000 were assessed with the Web survey in their final year of funding;<br />

communities funded from 2002 to 2006 are assessed during the fiscal years in which the Federal–local<br />

funding match requirements change (Years 3 <strong>and</strong> 4), <strong>and</strong> in their final year.<br />

Comparison Studies<br />

Comparison studies using quasi-experimental designs were conducted in three funded communities in<br />

Phase I (Stephens et al., 2005) <strong>and</strong> two in Phase II (CMHS, 2001, 2003), <strong>and</strong> matched communities.<br />

Non-funded communities were chosen by similar geographic <strong>and</strong> population characteristics, <strong>and</strong> their<br />

willingness to participate in the project. The design called for enrollment of the same number of children<br />

in the funded community <strong>and</strong> in the corresponding community, matched on age, gender, severity of<br />

behavioral <strong>and</strong> emotional problems <strong>and</strong> functional impairment. Measures used in the descriptive <strong>and</strong><br />

outcome studies were used in the comparison studies, with some additions. The Phase II comparison<br />

study included substudies of service experiences <strong>and</strong> provider characteristics.<br />

The Comprehensive Community <strong>Mental</strong> Health Services for Children <strong>and</strong> Their Families Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Findings</strong><br />

2006–2008 Annual Report to Congress ● Appendix D ● Page 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!