Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2006–2008 Annual Report to Congress ● Appendix E ● Page 4 The Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program Evaluation Findings Community Table E-2: Study Enrollment and Program Interview Completion for Grant Communities Funded in 2002–2004 as of June 2008 (continued) Descriptive Sample a Outcome Sample b 6- Month Eligible for Interview at Each Assessment Pointc 12- Month 18- Month 24- Month 30- Month 6- Month Completed Interview at Each Assessment Pointd 12- Month 18- Month 24- Month 30- Month 6- Month Interview Completion Rate at Each Assessment Pointe 77 293 147 147 136 121 95 60 60 47 21 8 0 40.8% 34.6% 17.4% 8.4% 0.0% 78 102 53 40 24 24 24 24 28 2 0 3 5 70.0% 8.3% 0.0% 12.5% 20.8% 79 446 280 280 254 212 166 118 244 210 172 133 94 87.1% 82.7% 81.1% 80.1% 79.7% 80 329 127 81 63 37 18 0 39 29 9 5 0 48.1% 46.0% 24.3% 27.8% 81 99 50 18 6 0 0 0 16 6 0 0 0 88.9% 100.0% 82 1,138 218 169 126 81 29 0 125 85 49 13 0 74.0% 67.5% 60.5% 44.8% 83 1,069 210 156 120 77 31 2 140 102 62 21 1 89.7% 85.0% 80.5% 67.7% 50.0% Aggregated Number 15,735 f 4,271 f 3,698 3,162 2,553 1,920 1,211 2,681 2,066 1,483 1,004 570 72.5% 65.3% 58.1% 52.3% 47.1% a Baseline Descriptive Sample is the number of cases with data submitted for any instrument. b Baseline Outcome Sample is the number of cases with at least one of the required outcome instruments completed at baseline and submitted. Because it may take more than one interview session to complete all the instruments for an assessment, the earliest instrument completion date for each child/youth at each assessment point is used for calculating the retention rates. The target assessment date for followup assessments is based on the child/youth‘s earliest baseline instrument date. Follow-up interview data may be collected during a window of 6 weeks before through 6 weeks after the target assessment date. c Eligible for Interview at Each Assessment Point is the number of children/youth for whom the following criteria are met at the time the data are downloaded: (a) the entire interview window has closed (each child/youth has exited the 6 weeks after the target assessment date window) and (b) at least one of the required outcome instruments administered at baseline has been submitted. d Completed Interview at Each Assessment Point is the number of children/youth for whom the following criteria are met at the time the data are downloaded: (a) the entire interview window has closed (each child/youth has exited the 6 weeks after the target assessment date window) and (b) at least one of the required outcome instruments for that followup assessment has been submitted. e Interview Completion Rate at Each Assessment Point is calculated as the (completed interview number at 6 weeks after the target assessment date / eligible number at 6 weeks after the target assessment date) x 100%. f The baseline descriptive and outcome sample numbers reflect the enrollment and data collection efforts of all sites since the beginning of the grant program. During FY 2006 two sites were defunded. Those sites contributed about 400 children to the baseline descriptive sample and about 20 children to the baseline outcome sample. Data from the two sites are not included in the aggregated number for eligible for interview, completed interview, and interview completion rate at each assessment point. 12- Month 18- Month 24- Month 30- Month
2006–2008 Annual Report to Congress ● Appendix E ● Page 5 The Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program Evaluation Findings Community Table E-3: Study Enrollment and Program Interview Completion for Grant Communities Funded in 2005–2006 as of June 2008 Descriptive Sample a Outcome Sample b 6- Month Eligible for Interview at Each Assessment Point c 12- Month 18- Month 24- Month 30- Month 6- Month Completed Interview at Each Assessment Point d 12- Month 18- Month 24- Month 30- Month 6- Month Interview Completion Rate at Each Assessment Point e 100 106 47 35 26 5 30 20 1 85.7% 76.9% 20.0% 101 79 39 33 26 8 31 17 2 93.9% 65.4% 25.0% 102 143 40 19 4 2 10 0 0 52.6% 0.0% 0.0% 103 118 112 93 38 1 22 0 0 23.7% 0.0% 0.0% 104 193 10 1 0 0.0% 105 82 66 55 24 42 13 76.4% 54.2% 106 146 74 68 30 2 39 10 0 57.4% 33.3% 0.0% 107 57 20 18 13 11 6 61.1% 46.2% 108 115 83 65 32 3 28 4 0 43.1% 12.5% 0.0% 109 53 37 13 5 11 2 84.6% 40.0% 110 211 98 82 16 48 0 58.5% 0.0% 111 198 89 63 42 1 52 26 0 82.5% 61.9% 0.0% 112 134 111 85 49 2 73 41 1 85.9% 83.7% 50.0% 113 204 103 49 16 35 12 71.4% 75.0% 114 33 25 20 5 17 1 85.0% 20.0% 115 319 60 42 7 12 0 28.6% 0.0% 116 299 130 112 62 2 64 8 0 57.1% 12.9% 0.0% 117 47 40 29 15 4 28 13 3 96.6% 86.7% 75.0% 118 31 29 16 16 119 69 18 9 5 55.6% 120 118 72 44 31 40 23 90.9% 74.2% 100.0 % 12- Month 18- Month 24- Month 30- Month
Page 1 and 2:
Comprehensive Community Mental Heal
Page 3 and 4:
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Page 5 and 6:
Program Overview The Comprehensive
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1: System of Care Theory-Bas
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 2: Timeline of System of Car
Page 11 and 12:
In addition, at the request of SAMH
Page 13 and 14:
Table 2: Core Components of the Nat
Page 15 and 16:
Table 4: Baseline Characteristics:
Page 17 and 18:
Clinical Outcomes Child/Youth’s B
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 4: Change in Caregiver Repor
Page 21 and 22: Figure 6: Change in Children’s or
Page 23 and 24: Caregiver Adequacy of Available Tim
Page 25 and 26: months after entering systems of ca
Page 27 and 28: Figure 11: Change in Percentage of
Page 29 and 30: Youth were least satisfied with the
Page 31 and 32: Figure 15: Average Infrastructure R
Page 33 and 34: How Well Are Communities Implementi
Page 35 and 36: Organizational characteristics, suc
Page 37 and 38: To What Extent Do Systems of Care I
Page 39 and 40: Sustainability Strategies (continue
Page 41 and 42: child’s mental health needs are m
Page 43 and 44: References Achenbach, T. M. (1991).
Page 45 and 46: Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O.
Page 47 and 48: Appendices
Page 49 and 50: Practice-Based Evidence: Practice-b
Page 51 and 52: Appendix B System of Care Communiti
Page 53 and 54: Project Name Catchment Area State Y
Page 55 and 56: Project Name Catchment Area State P
Page 57 and 58: Nak-Nu-Wit Project Name Catchment A
Page 59 and 60: Funded Communities Date Number 1993
Page 61 and 62: Definition of Indicators Child and
Page 63 and 64: 2006-2008 Annual Report to Congress
Page 65 and 66: Appendix D National Evaluation Comp
Page 67 and 68: National Evaluation Study Component
Page 69 and 70: Appendix E Descriptive and Outcomes
Page 71: 2006-2008 Annual Report to Congress
Page 75 and 76: Demographic Characteristics, Clinic
Page 77 and 78: Table E-4: Baseline Child and Famil
Page 79 and 80: Table E-4: Baseline Child and Famil
Page 81 and 82: Table E-5: Baseline Characteristics
Page 93 and 94: TableE-8: Baseline Characteristics:
Page 123 and 124:
2006-08 Annual Report to Congress
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
show all

Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?