Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

National Evaluation Study Components Treatment Effectiveness Studies Treatment effectiveness studies to examine evidence-based treatment implementation and outcomes in systems of care were implemented with three different treatments in six communities. Children received diagnostic assessments to screen for diagnoses treated by the evidence-based treatment; children accepted into the study were randomly assigned to treatment and service as usual groups. A study of family education and support to build evidence for a practice utilized in systems of care is under way. The treatment effectiveness study of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) examined the effectiveness of an evidence-based treatment provided to a selected group of children with specific diagnoses served within systems of care funded in 1998. The goal of the study was to examine whether children who received an evidence-based treatment delivered in a system of care experienced better outcomes and maintained those outcomes longer than children in the same system who did not receive the evidence-based treatment. The study, initiated in 2001, began with a multi-stage process, including a treatment nominations process, a community selection and recruitment process, a treatment selection process, evaluation design, material development, and training. Two communities, the Bridges Project in Eastern Kentucky and the Clackamas County Partnership in Clackamas County, Oregon, participated in the study. Each community selected PCIT. The study design was tailored to meet the needs of each community, and community-specific implementation and training materials were developed. Appropriate training workshops were presented to providers in the PCIT and non-PCIT conditions, and services were initiated in 2003. In the Oregon site, approximately 55 percent of the treatment group (n = 36) reported a decrease in caregiver strain from baseline to 18 months when compared to 34 percent of the control group (n = 41) ( 2 = 6.1, p < 0.05), according to caregiver report using the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire. About 14 percent (n = 28) of the treatment group ( 2 = 4.898, p < 0.05) improved on the child competence subscale of the Child Behavior Checklist from baseline to 18 months, while none of the children from the control group (n = 32) improved. In the Kentucky site, about half of the children from the treatment group (n = 16) gained strengths over the 18 months when compared to 38 percent of the control group children (n = 29) ( 2 = 6.675, p < 0.05), according to caregiver report using the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale. Special Studies Treatment Effectiveness Study examines the effectiveness of a specific evidence-based treatment provided to selected groups of children/youth with specific diagnoses served within CMHS-funded systems of care. Evidence-Based Practices Study examines the effects of various factors on the implementation of evidence-based practices in systems of care. Family Education and Support Study examines the critical elements of family education and support services in systems of care, their effectiveness across communities, and their impact on child/youth and family outcomes. Primary Care Provider Study investigates the role of primary health care providers in systems of care and factors that facilitate and interfere with interaction between primary care providers and mental health providers. Culturally and Linguistically Competent Practices Studies assess system of care service providers‘ level of competence across several domains of cultural competence, including the role that organizations and agencies play in hindering or facilitating culturally competent service provision. Tribal Financing Study examines the unique financing opportunities and challenges experienced by American Indian and Alaska Native systems of care. The Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program Evaluation Findings 2006–2008 Annual Report to Congress ● Appendix D ● Page 4
Appendix E Descriptive and Outcomes Data Tables Methods and Study Sample The Longitudinal Child and Family Outcome Study of grant communities assessed children and their families every 6 months, for up to 36 months, regardless of whether the children continued to receive services through system of care programs. This allowed comparison of clinical and functional outcomes for all children who participated in the Outcome Study, regardless of whether they remained in or exited system of care services. Grant communities initially funded in 2002–04 are expected to enroll 354 families and retain 276 families in Years 2 through 5 of funding. These figures may vary slightly for communities funded to serve smaller numbers of children (e.g., funding in some communities may be directed primarily toward infrastructure development, or the number of children meeting service criteria for serious emotional disturbance may be lower). While in most grant communities all willing families need to be recruited into the Outcome Study, in some larger communities, sampling strategies may need to be employed to select a sufficient number of families at random from the pool of children who enter the system of care program. Sample size in analyses conducted in this report fluctuates due to differences in enrollment and data completion rates across grant communities. Table E-1 presents study enrollment and data completion rates through October 2005 for each community initially funded in 1999– 2000. Tables E-2 and E-3 present study enrollment and data completion rates through June 2008 for each community initially funded in 2002–2004 and 2005–2006, respectively. The Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program Evaluation Findings 2006–2008 Annual Report to Congress ● Appendix E ● Page 1
Page 1 and 2:
Comprehensive Community Mental Heal
Page 3 and 4:
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Page 5 and 6:
Program Overview The Comprehensive
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1: System of Care Theory-Bas
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 2: Timeline of System of Car
Page 11 and 12:
In addition, at the request of SAMH
Page 13 and 14:
Table 2: Core Components of the Nat
Page 15 and 16:
Table 4: Baseline Characteristics:
Page 17 and 18: Clinical Outcomes Child/Youth’s B
Page 19 and 20: Figure 4: Change in Caregiver Repor
Page 21 and 22: Figure 6: Change in Children’s or
Page 23 and 24: Caregiver Adequacy of Available Tim
Page 25 and 26: months after entering systems of ca
Page 27 and 28: Figure 11: Change in Percentage of
Page 29 and 30: Youth were least satisfied with the
Page 31 and 32: Figure 15: Average Infrastructure R
Page 33 and 34: How Well Are Communities Implementi
Page 35 and 36: Organizational characteristics, suc
Page 37 and 38: To What Extent Do Systems of Care I
Page 39 and 40: Sustainability Strategies (continue
Page 41 and 42: child’s mental health needs are m
Page 43 and 44: References Achenbach, T. M. (1991).
Page 45 and 46: Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O.
Page 47 and 48: Appendices
Page 49 and 50: Practice-Based Evidence: Practice-b
Page 51 and 52: Appendix B System of Care Communiti
Page 53 and 54: Project Name Catchment Area State Y
Page 55 and 56: Project Name Catchment Area State P
Page 57 and 58: Nak-Nu-Wit Project Name Catchment A
Page 59 and 60: Funded Communities Date Number 1993
Page 61 and 62: Definition of Indicators Child and
Page 63 and 64: 2006-2008 Annual Report to Congress
Page 65 and 66: Appendix D National Evaluation Comp
Page 67: National Evaluation Study Component
Page 75 and 76: Demographic Characteristics, Clinic
Page 77 and 78: Table E-4: Baseline Child and Famil
Page 79 and 80: Table E-4: Baseline Child and Famil
Page 81 and 82: Table E-5: Baseline Characteristics
Page 93 and 94: TableE-8: Baseline Characteristics:
Page 119 and 120:
2006-08 Annual Report to Congress
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
show all

Evaluation Findings - SAMHSA Store - Substance Abuse and Mental ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?