18.01.2015 Views

Exhibit 8, 100416 Brazil FMD Risk Evaluation - R-Calf

Exhibit 8, 100416 Brazil FMD Risk Evaluation - R-Calf

Exhibit 8, 100416 Brazil FMD Risk Evaluation - R-Calf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

apparent [28]. Survival of both SVD and ASF viruses in genetic material is possible but is not<br />

considered to be a primary mode of transmission [29, 30].<br />

Based on the extended period of survival of CSF and <strong>FMD</strong> viruses in frozen semen, APHIS<br />

considers the likelihood of exposure of susceptible animals to these viruses in infected semen, if it<br />

were to be imported into the United States, to be high if unmitigated. However, based on the results<br />

of the release assessment, APHIS considers the likelihood of release of CSF or <strong>FMD</strong> viruses via<br />

infected semen from Santa Catarina to be very low. The likelihood of exposure of domestic<br />

livestock would be similarly low.<br />

Consequence Assessment<br />

A consequence assessment describes the biologic and economic consequences of introducing the<br />

hazards under consideration into the United States. This consequence assessment addresses both<br />

direct and indirect consequences, as recommended by the OIE [20].<br />

The magnitude of the biologic and economic consequences following an introduction of <strong>FMD</strong>, CSF,<br />

SVD, or ASF virus would depend on the location of the introduction, the virus serotype introduced,<br />

the rate of virus spread and whether environmental conditions at the introduction site might facilitate<br />

this spread, the site’s ability to detect the disease rapidly, livestock demographics and movement<br />

patterns, and the ease of employing eradication procedures. In addition, depending on the extent of<br />

export of livestock and animal products, trade restrictions imposed by trading partners may result in<br />

severe economic consequences [31].<br />

Direct consequences include effects of the disease on animal health and subsequent production<br />

losses, the total costs of control and eradication, the effect on the environment, and public health<br />

consequences. Indirect consequences include effects on international trade and associated domestic<br />

consequences.<br />

Animal health consequences<br />

<strong>FMD</strong><br />

<strong>FMD</strong> causes significant distress and suffering to animals regardless of the size and sophistication of<br />

their livestock unit. Very high mortality rates in young animals can occur, particularly among pigs<br />

and sheep. Mortality in older animals occurs less frequently but may be significant with certain<br />

virus strains [24, 32, 33].<br />

<strong>FMD</strong> also causes significant losses in the production capacity of affected animals. Productivity<br />

losses of 10 percent to 20 percent are reported in <strong>FMD</strong>-infected livestock if the disease is allowed to<br />

run its course. In addition, <strong>FMD</strong> can cause a reduction in the growth rate of animals raised for meat.<br />

The comparatively greater severity of <strong>FMD</strong> in pigs would imply at least similar losses to those<br />

described for cattle [31, 34].<br />

APHIS <strong>Evaluation</strong> of the Status of the <strong>Brazil</strong>ian State of Santa Catarina 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!