18.01.2015 Views

Exhibit 8, 100416 Brazil FMD Risk Evaluation - R-Calf

Exhibit 8, 100416 Brazil FMD Risk Evaluation - R-Calf

Exhibit 8, 100416 Brazil FMD Risk Evaluation - R-Calf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CSF<br />

CSF has acute and chronic courses. The severity of the disease depends largely on the age of the<br />

animal and the virulence of the viral strain, with young animals usually more severely affected than<br />

older animals. In older breeding pigs the course of infection is often mild or even subclinical,<br />

whereas mortality rates may reach 90 percent in young pigs [35]. Low virulence strains may<br />

manifest primarily as poor reproductive performance and birth of piglets with neurologic defects<br />

[35].<br />

SVD<br />

SVD is typically a transient vesicular disease of pigs. The virus causes essentially no mortality, and<br />

infected pigs generally recover within 1 week (on occasion, recovery may take up to 3 weeks).<br />

Some strains produce only mild clinical symptoms or are asymptomatic. Morbidity rates may be<br />

low throughout a whole herd but high in certain pens [29].<br />

ASF<br />

ASF is a highly contagious hemorrhagic disease of pigs. All age groups are equally susceptible.<br />

With high virulence forms of the virus, ASF is characterized by high fever, loss of appetite,<br />

hemorrhages in the skin and internal organs, and death within 2 to 10 days on average. Herd<br />

mortality rates may be as high as 100 percent [30].<br />

Economic consequences<br />

The overall cost of control and eradication depends on the mitigation or policy options chosen to<br />

control and eradicate the disease. Potential costs include costs for disease control measures such as<br />

imposing quarantine measures and movement controls, direct costs related to stamping out of<br />

affected herds, indemnity payments, vaccination costs, and costs for surveillance and laboratory<br />

testing. For disease-free countries like the United States that have a substantial export market for<br />

livestock and livestock products, the preferred option for control and eradication has traditionally<br />

been to stamp out infected herds without the use of vaccine.<br />

The U.S. policy for most significant foreign animal disease emergencies is to follow strict quarantine<br />

measures and stamp out infected and contact herds. Officials also assess the need for strategic<br />

vaccination, and carry out vaccination if necessary. Available data do not allow quantification of the<br />

number of herds or farms that could be infected if one of the diseases under evaluation were<br />

introduced into the United States. Nevertheless, the cost of control, eradication, and compensation is<br />

likely to be significant.<br />

<strong>FMD</strong><br />

A few studies have estimated the potential consequences of an <strong>FMD</strong> outbreak in the United States.<br />

Bates et al (2003) used results from an <strong>FMD</strong> simulation model to estimate the direct costs associated<br />

with indemnity, slaughter, cleaning, and disinfecting livestock premises for various vaccination and<br />

APHIS <strong>Evaluation</strong> of the Status of the <strong>Brazil</strong>ian State of Santa Catarina 66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!